An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

ICON Wins About $700,000 But Loses Injunction Against Former Employee In FINRA Arbitration
Written: March 30, 2012

In a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Arbitration Statement of Claimfiled in May 2009, Claimants asserted causes of action for: 
  • alleged breach of contract by Respondent Holmes;
  • tortious interference with a contract by Respondents Adviser Dealer, Meeder Asset and Meeder Financial; and
  • interference with prospective business relationships against Respondents Adviser Dealer, Meeder Asset, Meeder Financial and Holmes.

The causes of action related to Respondent Holmes’ prior employment with Claimants. The Claimants sought an order requiring Respondents to return any and all copies of Claimants’ confidential, proprietary, and/or trade secret information within their possession, custody or control.  Additionally, Claimants sought damages in an amount to be proven at hearing, interest, fees, and costs.

Request For Permanent Injunctions

Additionally, Claimants requested entry of a Permanent Injunction that would:

permanently enjoin Respondent Holmes from:

  • Working, as a regular employee, independent contractor, consultant, or intern, for any of the Claimants’ direct competitors;
  • Contacting, directly or indirectly, alone or in concert with others, any of Claimant/Counter-Respondents’ clients or those clients’ respective registered representatives or advisors, including Lincoln, Securities America, America International Group, and National Financial Partners, as well as any and all Pinnacle Club members; and
  • Directly or indirectly, using or disclosing to any person or entity any confidential information.

permanently enjoin Respondents Adviser Dealer, Meeder Asset, and Meeder Financial from:

  • continuing to employ or employing Respondent Holmes, whether as a regular employee, independent contractor, consultant, or intern, until the expiration of two years after the last day of Holmes’ employment with Claimants.

Get Yer Scorecard Here

The caption to this case sort of underscores how bitter and extended the underlying dispute apparently became:

In the Matter of the FINRA Arbitration Between:


ICON Advisers, Inc.

ICON Distributors, Inc.

ICON Management & Research Corporation


Respondents/Counter-Claimants/Third-Party Claimants

Adviser Dealer Services, Inc.

Stephen C. Holmes

Meeder Asset Management, Inc.

Meeder Financial, Inc.


Third-Party Respondent

Craig Thomas Callahan

(FINRA Arbitration 10-02253, March 27, 2012).

Respondents generally denied the allegations, asserted various affirmative defenses, and asserted a Counterclaim against Claimants for:

  • breach of the non-disparagement clause of their agreement;
  • defamation; and
  • tortious interference with the contract.

Additionally, in Respondents’ Third-Party Claim against Third-Party Respondent Callahan, they asserted defamation and breach of the non-disparagement clause of their agreement.


The FINRA Arbitration Panel found Respondents Adviser Dealer, Meeder Asset and Meeder Financial jointly and severally liable and ordered them to pay to Claimants:

  • $250,000 in nominal damages;
  • $200,000 in nominal damages for tortious interference with business relationships;
  • $50,000 for tortious interference with prospective business;
  • $164,170.00 in attorneys fees pursuant to the terms of the Retirement Agreement;
  • $11,120.81 in costs; and
  • $26,000 in expert witness fees.

The FINRA Arbitration Panel declined to enjoin any activity by Respondents.

Separately, the FINRA Arbitration Panel found Claimants jointly and severally liable to and ordered them to pay Respondent Holmes:

  • $6,143.00 in attorneys’ fees;
  • $150,000 for his ownership share in AthenaInvest (which he must sign over to Claimants).

The Arbitrators denied the Third-Party Claim.

The Arbitrators ruled that Claimants and Holmes are fully released from any further obligations under the 2009 Retirement Agreement and the2010 Separation Agreement; and that both parties are held harmless from any and all liability arising from the actions and events that occurred before and including the signing of the agreements.

Bill Singer’s Comment

Regular readers of my “Street Sweeper” column know that this type of FINRA Arbitration Decision earns little more than a razz from me.  As best we can infer from the vague presentation of crucial facts, Respondent Holmes appears to have “retired” from Claimants’ employ in or around 2009/2010.  Based upon online FINRA regulatory documents as of March 30, 2012, Respondent Holmes was registered with Claimant ICON Distributors Inc. from 1998 until about February 2010; thereafter, about April 2010 he became employed with Respondents Meeder. I’m drawing the distinction between “registered” and “employed” but I’m not certain that I’m correct — just a hunch.

As best we can tell, this case arose from a dispute attendant to Respondent Holmes’ apparent “retirement” from Claimants — but for the fact that he seems to have un-retired a few months after leaving (albeit he may not have resumed his registered activities — or he may have, or maybe not, or . . . well, like I said, it’s just not clear).  Whether there was bad faith in the representations that Holmes made to his former employers is abundantly unclear to me from a reading of this Decision but for the fact that someone must have done something wrong in order to elicit the awarding of nearly $700,000 in damages, costs, and fees. Again, I’m guessing that Claimants thought that the former employee had “retired,” which is quite different from merely resigning.

How about I just leave it at that? I dunno what the hell this case is really about or who did what to whom.  Lately, I’ve been writing about these employment disputes and the demand for an injunction — by Edward Jones, Merrill Lynch, and others — is becoming a common aspect.  Some FINRA Arbitration Panels explain the nature of the dispute and offer a detailed rationale.  Good for them!  Other Panels just drive me crazy, as was the case here.

The only saving grace here is that the Decision offers a glimpse into the panoramic relief sought by a jilted employer.  It’s also interesting because this Panel fashioned a ruling that declined to enjoin any conduct but, nonetheless, walloped the Respondents with a hefty financial penalty.  Still — this Decision has all the usefulness of an unalphabetized dictionary.


Previous Entries
April 18, 2014
We just made it through another tax season. The good news is that you filed and are fully paid up -- or, the bad news is that you didn't file or you h... Read On
April 17, 2014
In this digital age there are still folks who physically cut-and-paste. How quaint. Of course, quaint or not, when you start using the terms "cut-and-... Read On
April 16, 2014
Here's an interesting cocktail of facts: an IRA, a mother, powers of attorney, and a stockbroker son. Add into that mix questions about whether a $60,... Read On
April 15, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsFor a full listing of current job openings, visit the BrokeAndBroker Employment Page ... Read On
April 14, 2014
Auction Rate Securities are the unwanted gift that keeps on giving. In today's Blog, we report about yet another bit of collateral ... Read On
April 12, 2014
Citicorp Loses Bizarre Motion To Compel Class Action ArbitrationApril 11, 2014As part of the terms of his employment, former Citicorp Credit Services,... Read On
April 11, 2014
As part of the terms of his employment, former Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. employee Keith Russell had agreed to arbitrate “all employment-related d... Read On Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Morgan Keegan Arbitration Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker Prison NASAA Aguilar FCPA Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Variable Annuity Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses OIP ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Barclays Willful Apple Time And Price T&P Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Argentina Judgment Bank Fraud TSSB Trustee Frumento 6th Circuit Proctor Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Compromise Website Supervision Piwowar Tax Liens signature VA
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+