An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Former Employee Wages 4 Year Battle Over Form U5 Expungement
Written: April 24, 2012


A registered person battles his former employer over Form U5 language

According to online records of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), Jeffrey Wayne Prior was first registered in the securities industry around 2002, and during the relevant period of 2008, he was employed at Compass Brokerage, Inc., which is now known as BBVA Compass Investment Solutions, Inc. (“Compass”).  About three months after starting employment at Compass, Prior was terminated in May 2008 and his Form U5 disclosed that he was “Permitted To Resign” on April 28, 2008, for the following reason (FINRA online disclosure as of April 24, 2012):

SUSPECTED OF INTENTIONALLY ENTERING FALSE TIME WORKED ENTRIES FOR EMPLOYEE UNDER REPRESENTATIVE’S SUPERVISION AS THE FIRM’S PARENT BANK’S BRANCH MANAGER.

Other than the above incident, Prior’s industry record was unblemished.

Expungement

Apparently, Prior took exception to the characterization of the reason for his permitted resignation and in July 2010 filed a FINRA Arbitration Statement of Claim alleging that Respondent Compass made a false and improper Form U5 disclosure. Claimant Prior sought an expungement of the cited language from his Form U5. In the Matter of the FINRA Arbitration Between Jeffrey Wayne Prior, Claimant, vs. BBVA Compass Investment Solutions, Inc, (f/k/a Compass Brokerage, Inc.), Respondent (FINRA Arbitration 10-03273, April 18, 2012).

Respondent Compass generally denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses.

On October 18, 2011 the parties notified FINRA that they had settled their dispute, and provided aStipulated Award to the FINRA Arbitration Panel (consisting of two panelists following the withdrawal of the Chair). In accordance with the stipulations, the Panel considered the parties’ proposed Form U5 amendment and approved the terms.  Consequently, the Panel recommended the expungement of the prior Termination Commentcited above and proposed the following substitution:

Mr. Prior was permitted to resign after paying overtime pay to a ‘nonexempt’ salaried employee. Although Mr. Prior brought this to the attention of supervisors when the oversight was discovered, it still violated the bank’s payroll policies. Based on information currently known, Mr.Prior’s conduct did not violate FINRA rules and regulations or securities sales practice rules, nor did it result in any customer harm. This did not involve the purchase or sale of investments, securities or insurance.

Similarly, the Panel recommended conforming amendments to requiring Question 7F(1)The Panel also recommends the expungement of the Form U5 answer to Question 7F(1) from “YES” to “NO”:

Termination Disclosure

7F.

Did the individual voluntarily resign from your firm, or was the individual discharged or permitted to resign from your firm, after allegations were made that accused the individual of:

  1. violating investment-related statutes, regulations, rules or industry standards of conduct?
  2. fraud or the wrongful taking of property?
  3. failure to supervise in connection with investment-related statutes, regulations, rules or industry standards of conduct?

Finally, the Panel recommended the deletion in its entirety of the accompanying Disclosure Reporting Page (“DRP”).

Bill Singer’s Comment

Alas, welcome to the overly-complicated, oft-times Byzantine world of modern day banking and securities brokerage. For example, consider that the indefatigable Claimant Prior had the misfortune of holding a job that his former employer could only somewhat explain as the FINRA brokerage “FIRM’S PARENT BANK’S BRANCH MANAGER.” Hey, knock yourself out trying to parse through that.

Next, take a gander at the timeline for this meandering mess of a dispute. Prior was permitted to resign in 2008. About two years later, this arbitration was commenced. In October 2011, the parties settled but, somehow, it took over six more months for the FINRA Arbitration Panel to issue this expungement decision.

Frankly, I can’t even begin to comprehend why the parties wasted nearly four years on this case — it would seem that reasonable minds should have realized that a more comprehensive explanation of the circumstances was a fair resolution of the dispute.  As to whether Claimant or Respondent was the naysayer to the proposed compromise is not known to us but given the final version of the Form U5 explanation, I suspect that the firm was largely dragging its heels — but I could be wrong with that assumption and will stand corrected if that’s the case.

I don’t like — actually “detest” would be more appropriate — a four-year-old Form U5 that in 2012 still notes that a employer/firm “suspects” some wrongdoing as the basis for a termination. At some point either you have or have not formed an opinion. It’s the old put-up-or-shut-up. It is unfair when FINRA permits member firms to litter regulatory filings with inconclusive allegations , particularly for several years.  At some point, the self-regulatory organization should require that the normal course of housekeeping requires a firm conclusion or the deletion of the suspicion from the filing.  These open-ended ruminations have terribly detrimental impacts upon registered persons lives. The landscape of litigation is filled with similarly situated employees of bank holding companies/bank parents/brokerage subsidiaries at Citigroup, JP Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, to name but a few. This is not an isolated occurrence.  This limbo has become a pervasive problem.

Finally, my compliments to Claimant Prior for understanding that when it comes to regulatory disclosures, “less” is not always better and “more” may, in fact, be preferred.  In this case, Prior had additional language added to the Form U5 that made the underlying situation clearer.  This was not an issue involving any theft of payroll funds or a kickback but a dispute over the payment of overtime authorized and paid to another employee by Prior. Furthermore, Prior’s U5 comment will now unequivocally states to anyone who reads his history that the basis for his resignation did not “violate FINRA rules and regulations or securities sales practice rules, nor did it result in any customer harm. This did not involve the purchase or sale of investments, securities or insurance.”

I mean, seriously, this took four years to negotiate?  On the other hand, who am I to complain?  I charge clients for such wizardry.


 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
April 19, 2014
Will This Tax Season Lien On You?April 18, 2014We just made it through another tax season. The good news is that you filed and are fully paid up -- or... Read On
April 18, 2014
We just made it through another tax season. The good news is that you filed and are fully paid up -- or, the bad news is that you didn't file or you h... Read On
April 17, 2014
In this digital age there are still folks who physically cut-and-paste. How quaint. Of course, quaint or not, when you start using the terms "cut-and-... Read On
April 16, 2014
Here's an interesting cocktail of facts: an IRA, a mother, powers of attorney, and a stockbroker son. Add into that mix questions about whether a $60,... Read On
April 15, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsFor a full listing of current job openings, visit the BrokeAndBroker Employment Page ... Read On
April 14, 2014
Auction Rate Securities are the unwanted gift that keeps on giving. In today's BrokeAndBroker.com Blog, we report about yet another bit of collateral ... Read On
April 12, 2014
Citicorp Loses Bizarre Motion To Compel Class Action ArbitrationApril 11, 2014As part of the terms of his employment, former Citicorp Credit Services,... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker Prison NASAA Aguilar FCPA Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Variable Annuity Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses OIP ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Barclays Willful Apple Time And Price T&P Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Argentina Judgment Bank Fraud TSSB Trustee Frumento 6th Circuit Proctor Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Compromise Website Supervision Piwowar Tax Liens signature VA
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+