An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Citigroup Wins FINRA Arbitration And Expungement As Public Customer Pulls A No-Show
Written: July 9, 2012

MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA - SEPTEMBER 27:  Passenge...

Members of the Panel, my client tried, really tried to get here today for the Arbitration. What can I tell you? He says that he got on line at the airport two hours early and is still waiting to get a boarding pass several days later

In the Matter of the FINRA Arbitration Between Stavros Oscar Cid and Teresa Cid JTWROS, Claimants, vs. John Joseph Abadiotakis and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Respondents (FINRA Arbitration 10-04784, July 3, 2012).

In a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Arbitration Statement of Claim filed in April 2011, and as thereafter amended, Claimants asserted causes of action in negligence, unauthorized trading, unsuitable recommendations, churning, failure to supervise, breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentations and omissions. The claims involved investments in unspecified equities and mutual funds.  Claimants sought $294,000.00 in compensatory damages; $100,000 in punitive damages;  $73,525.00 in attorneys’ fees; and $3,925 in costs.

Respondents generally denied the allegations, asserted various affirmative defenses, and sought an expungement of Respondent Abadiotakis’s Central Registration Depository records (“CRD”).

Heel Draggin’

On or about November 14, 2011, Claimants filed a Motion to Postpone the December 6, 7, and 8, 2011 hearings. Respondents filed an Opposition and Motion for Sanctions. The Panel denied the Motion to Postpone and threatened to impose  $10,000 in sanctions plus forum fees, costs, and Respondents’ attendant legal fees if Claimants failed to appear at the scheduled December hearings.

Claimants did not appear at the December 6, 2011 hearing, which was adjourned and rescheduled for June 5, 6, and 7, 2012.

On or about February 10, 2012,  Claimants submitted a Request for the Panel’s Reconsideration of Sanctions, with documents and information explaining why
Claimants were not able to appear at the December 2011 hearings. After reviewing the submissions and respondents’s opposition, the Panel found Claimants’s documentation insufficient and Claimants were given until April 20, 2012 to produce additional documentation.

On or about May 16, 2012, Respondents filed aMotion to Enforce the Sanctions for Failure to Appear and Motion for Sanctions for Failing to Comply with Discovery Order. Claimants filed anOpposition dated May 22, 2012. The Panel ordered Claimants to pay to the Respondents the sum of $10,000.00 upon the conclusion of the case.  The Panel deferred ruling on Respondents’ Motion to Extend the Order of Sanctions until the hearing in this matter.

Claimants’ counsel, but not Claimants, attended the June 5, 2012 hearing, at which time, Respondents moved to dismiss.

AWARD

The FINRA Arbitration Panel dismissed Claimant’s claims in their entirety with prejudice.  The Panel found Claimants jointly and severally liable and ordered them to pay to Respondents $10,000.00 as sanctions pursuant to the panel’s previous Orders.

SIDE BAR: It is not an unusual occurrence for a party to seek an extension of time or an adjournment — things happen in all of our lives that necessitate last-minute cancellations.  On the other hand, in litigation one typically expects the respondent/defendant to engage in delay as a means of forestalling the inevitable, painful outcome — when a claimant/plaintiff starts asking for delays, it raises a whole different set of concerns.  Among the more common questions that arise when those initiating lawsuits start applying the brakes is whether the claims were brought solely to force a settlement and with the finality of the preliminaries now looming, has that bluff been called and the case beginning to evaporate for lack of proof.

 Of course, those who represent public customer or industry claimants will quickly interject that the big boys don’t always play fair and many motions for additional time are caused by the failure to turn over discoverable materials that constitute the very proof needed to sustain one’s case.  As such, it’s typically firms such as Citigroup, Merrill LynchMorgan Stanley, JP Morgan, and Wells Fargo that are on the stinging end of a Panel’s rebuke for not timely responding in FINRA arbitrations; however, more than a few public customers’s lawyers have perfected the art of delay.

The response of most arbitrators when faced with contested requests for delay is typically to ask for an explanation as to what compelled the need to move things to a later date.  Among the more common explanations are a death in the family, illness, another case fast-tracked in the courts, unavailability of a key witness, and ongoing settlement discussions.  The closer in time to the date at issue, the more scrutiny to the bona fides of the excuses or explanations.

In considering the Claimants’s requests and conduct, this FINRA Arbitration Panel explained that:

Because of Claimants failure to appear at any scheduled hearing, the Claimants being out of the country at the time of the scheduled hearings, and apparently planning now to remain out of the country and not to return for an indeterminate period of time, and sanctions in the amount of $10,000.00 having already been imposed by the Panel for Claimants’ material and apparently intentional failure to adequately and credibly document their reasons for their non-appearance at any hearing; and further because of Claimants failure to respond adequately to discovery orders of the Panel, the Panel chose, at the time of the hearing on June 5, 2012, to dismiss the claim against Respondents with prejudice, as a sanction pursuant to FINRA Rule 12212(c).

Expungement

The Panel recommended the expungement of Respondent Abadiotakis’ CRD and provided the following rationale:

In the absence of any appearance by Claimants at any hearing or prehearing in this matter, and in order to determine the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in the Claimants’ Statement of Claim, the Panel reviewed extensive documentary exhibits produced in evidence, which documents included Claimants’ tax returns, account P/L client statements, new account documents, bank statements (foreign and domestic), annuity documents, and trade confirmations. With respect to the allegation of unauthorized trading, we found that (with the exception of a small trading account managed by the Claimants) the accounts were third-party discretionary accounts. We further found that all trade confirmations were routinely provided to Claimants. We considered, also, that throughout the relevant period. Claimants made neither verbal nor written complaints to management concerning trading in these accounts. Accordingly, the Panel found no evidence of unauthorized trading and therefore rules this allegation to be false. With respect to the allegation of churning, because we found no evidence of excessive trading and because (except as noted above) the accounts were fee based and thus not generating commissions compensation to Respondent Abadiotakis, there was neither indication of nor basis for an allegation of churning. Accordingly, we found the allegation of churning to be false. With respect to the allegation of unsuitability, given Claimants’ investment history, investment objectives, risk tolerance and other information contained in the new account documents, we found no evidence of trading that was unsuitable for these Claimants. Accordingly, the Panel found the allegation of unsuitability to be false. Claimants’ Statement of Claim also makes allegations of negligence and misrepresentation/omission. The Panel found nothing in the exhibits presented to show that the accounts were maintained by Respondent Abadiotakis in a negligent manner and all disclosures, notices, trade confirmations, etc., were consistent with responsible, appropriate and customary industry practice. Accordingly, the Panel found the allegations of negligence, misrepresentation/omission to be false.


 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
October 21, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#wallstreetjobs @brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS... Read On
October 20, 2014
Once upon a time, Wall Street's regulators seemed to view so-called "Failure To Supervise" matters as a last resort -- the final arrow in a quiver. &n... Read On
October 18, 2014
Athena No Goddess Says SEC in HFT SettlementOctober 17, 2014In an effort to cultivate an orderly daily closing, ten minutes before the close at 3:50:0... Read On
October 17, 2014
In an effort to cultivate an orderly daily closing, ten minutes before the close at 3:50:00 p.m., NASDAQ releases a Net Order Imbalance Indicator, whi... Read On
October 17, 2014
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Commissioner Michael S. Piwowar and his often like-minded colleague, Commissioner Daniel Gallagher, are the... Read On
October 16, 2014
On October 15, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed an Order Instituting an Administrative Proceeding (“OIP”) against “Complianc... Read On
October 15, 2014
You should be thrilled to learn that the venerable Lloyds & Associates Management Ltd. is involved in this deal that I’m going to pitch to you. Yo... Read On
October 14, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#wallstreetjobs @brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration Counterclaim BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab Commission CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers SIPC IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Department of Justice Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 Eligibility RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity Expense Reimbursement FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker RIA Prison Disclosure NASAA Aguilar FCPA Subway Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank Hospital God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Reuters Retaliation Variable Annuity Arbitraiton Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education OIP Tax Liens Willful CE Unregistered Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Impersonator Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks RMBS AML PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement Money Market employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Arrest Barclays Liens Failure To Supervise Apple Time And Price T&P Willfully Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Debit Card Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Charge Sexist NML Argentina Embezzlement Silver Judgment Bank Fraud Deceased TSSB Mary Jo White Trustee Motion To Dismiss Frumento Conspiracy 6th Circuit Proctor Rule 3040 Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Self Regulation Short Sale Compromise Website TRO Supervision Vacatur SDNY BrokeAndBroker Bill Singer Piwowar Rule 1122 Article V signature Inside Information VA Regulation SP Customer Rule 3270 OWB Stockbrokers
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+