An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

UPDATE: Another Hospital Bid Rigging Defendant Pleads Out In NY Federal Case
Written: July 12, 2012

Seal of the United States Department of Justice

This is an UPDATE of a Street Sweeper column that ran on July 11, 2012.

Healthcare is big business.  You may not like that fact but you’re going to have to get over it. Just witness the battle lines that were drawn over the recent Obamacare fight to get a sense of the bucks involved.

The economics of treating the sick among us has reduced the numbers of solo practitioners and independent community hospitals. Today, it’s about humongous medical practice “Centers” operated by even more humongous hospitals.  Have you sat down to watch television without seeing one of those feel-good commercials for a treatment or surgery you didn’t know you needed?

Tenet HealthcareHCA HoldingsUniversal HealthServices, Community Health Systems, Health Management Associates, to name but a few, are all publicly traded hospital companies.  Along with a stock symbol comes the demand to turn a profit, to control costs.  Add into this sector all of the university affiliated hospitals and you have an industry that’s collapsing over healthcare costs, government programs, and corruption.

Of course, let’s not pretend that the entire hospital sector isn’t a frequent target of civil and criminal lawsuits for malpractice, negligence, and corruption — many of those stories have been reported here on “Street Sweeper” in recent years.

With growing competition to service hospitals and with the ever-increasing size of such contracts, we’ve also seen evidence of increasing corruption at the hospitals themselves.  The hidden cost of kickbacks and bribes imposes numerous challenges upon the victimized hospitals and their patients — overcharges for services that could have been obtained cheaper elsewhere, a lessening in the integrity of critical maintenance, and the whole host of crap that goes hand in hand with the corrosive nature of backdoor and under-the-table dealings.

Antitrust Division Case

An investigation by the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division’s New York Field Office discovered evidence of an eight-year conspiracy that engaged in  bid rigging, fraud, bribery and tax-related offenses in connection with the awarding of construction, maintenance and service contracts for the purpose ofasbestos abatement, air monitoring and general construction by the facilities operations department of New York Presbyterian Hospital (“NYPH”). Allegedly involved in the conspiracy to defraud the hospital were:

  • Michael Yaron and two companies owned by him:
  • Cambridge Environmental & Construction Corp., which does business as National Environmental Associates (Cambridge/NEA), an asbestos abatement company, and
  • Oxford Construction & Development Corp., a construction company;
  • Moshe Buchnik, the president of two asbestos abatement companies;
  • Santo Saglimbeni, a former vice president of facilities operations at NYPH;
  • Artech Corporation, a company owned by a relative of Saglimbeni; and
  • Emilio “Tony” Figueroa, a former director of facilities operations at NYPH.

The investigation determined that Saglimbeni, with the assistance of Figueroa, awarded asbestos abatement, air monitoring and general construction contracts to Yaron, Buchnik, Cambridge/NEA and Oxford in return for over $2.3 million in kickbacks paid to Saglimbeni. Thereafter, it was alleged that a portion of those kickbacks were funneled by Yaron to Saglimbeni through Artech. The feds characterized Artech as a sham company created by Saglimbeni in order to conceal the kicbacks — moreover, Saglimbeni put the company in his mother’s name.

Indictment

On April 27, 2010, a New York City federal grand jury returned an Indictmentcharging Yaron, Cambridge Environmental & Construction Corp., Oxford Construction & Development Corp, Buchnik, Figueroa, Saglimbeni, and Artech with engaging in wire and mail fraud conspiracies to defraud NYPH, starting as early as 2000 and extending through at least January 2008; and with substantive wire fraud as a result of the electronic transfers of money from the bank account of one co-conspirator to the bank account of Artech on or about May 5, 2005.

It was further alleged that from as early as June 2001 through June 2006, Saglimbeni, Figueroa, and their co-conspirators engaged in a mail fraud conspiracy, in which Saglimbeni and Figueroa awarded contracts for the installation and repair of the Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems (“HVAC”) at NYPH to a co-conspirator’s company in return for cash kickbacks and other valuable gifts given to Saglimbeni and Figueroa by that co-conspirator.

Finally, Saglimbeni and Figueroa were also charged with mail fraud as a result of causing NYPH to mail a payment on a fraudulently awarded contract to a co-conspirator’s company on or about May 5, 2005.

SIDE BAR: The mail and wire fraud violations that the individuals are charged with each carry a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a $1 million fine. The maximum fine for the charges may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine. The Indictment also seeks the forfeiture of certain assets as they relate to the kickbacks received in connection with the mail fraud charges in the indictment.

Conviction

Previously, 10 individuals and three companies pleaded guilty to charges arising out of this investigation.

After a four-week trial, on February 2, 2012, a Manhattan jury convicted Yaron, Buchnik, Saglimbeni and Figueroa; and Cambridge/NEA, Oxford Construction & Development Corp, and Artech for conspiracy and wire fraud.

At sentencing on  July 10, 2012, the Court handed down the following:

  • Yaron: 60 months in jail;  $500,000 criminal fine.
  • Cambridge/NEA and Oxford Construction: Each sentenced to pay a $1 million criminal fine.
  • Moshe Buchnik: 48 months in jail and to pay a $500,000 criminal fine for his role in the conspiracy.
  • Artech Corp: $1 million criminal fine.

Saglimbeni and Figueroa are scheduled to appear in court on July 31, 2012.

“The sentences imposed today are consistent with the seriousness of the crimes for which the individuals and companies were found guilty,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Joseph Wayland in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “Today’s sentences hold accountable the unlawful conduct of those involved in illegal kickback conspiracies.”

Counts three and four of the Superseding Indictment charging Saglimbeni and Figueroa with mail fraud conspiracy and mail fraud were severed from the matter and is scheduled for trial in August 2012 in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan. The defendants are presumed innocent on those counts unless and until found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

SIDE BAR: The wire fraud and wire fraud conspiracy charges each carry a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison for individuals and a $1 million criminal fine for individuals and companies. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.

Bill Singer’s Comment

After recently excoriating the Antitrust Division in “UPDATE: LIBOR The Antitrust Division’s Trojan Horse?” (“ Street Sweeper” July 3, 2012) — and noting that the division is planning on closing down four of its field offices in favor of a dubious plan of consolidation in its Washington, DC headquarters — it’s nice to see that justice was done to some truly bad guys who harmed those most vulnerable among us: hospital patients and their families.

The politics of regulation and prosecution is too often influenced by a quest for headlines, and far too often those headlines trumpet relatively meaningless victories that occur within the context of a “high profile” industry.  All regulators and prosecutors have limited funds and resources and are obligated to triage their investigations and trials.  Unfortunately, too many of those decisions are often influenced by considerations about plumping up one’s resume or getting face-time on television.

What I like about this reported case is that it strikes me as a proper use of our nation’s limited prosecutorial resources.  The contracts involved in this case were, of all things, pertaining to asbestos! Not exactly an area where a contract should be awarded based upon a kickback rather than competency and competitive bids.  Similarly, the asbestos at issue was in a hospital, as in a place where there are folks battling illnesses and don’t need the added complication of asbestos particulate in the air. Finally, about the last thing that you want is to learn that those cleaning up asbestos problems are bribing hospital agents to get the job — which makes you wonder if those providers were compelled to take short-cuts in order to cover the cost of the payoffs and bribes.

UPDATE

On March 31, 2010, a Manhattan Grand JuryIndictment (originally filed under seal on February 18, 2010) was unsealed in which David Porath, a former owner of a maintenance and insulation company, was charged with engaging in a conspiracy to rig bids for NYPH contracts for re-insulation services, and for filing a false federal tax return in 2005 that substantially understated his income. Porath and Andrzej Gosek, the owner of a Langhorne, PA, company that provides asbestos abatement services, were also charged with conspiring to defraud the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).

The Indictment alleged that between approximately 2000 and March 2005, NYPH awarded a number of contracts for re-insulation services to Porath’s company in response to what was supposed to be competitive bidding.  In reality, Porath and his co-conspirators allegedly submitted fraudulently high bids by competitor companies, which allowed Porath’s company to appear to be the winning low bid.

Between October 2000 and February 2005, theIndictment alleged that Porath gave Gosek checks made out to companies in Brooklyn, NY, purportedly for NYPH work done by those companies as sub-contractors to Porath’s company; however, federal prosecutors alleged that the companies had not performed such work and merely cashed the checks – thereafter, Gosek delivered the cash back to Porath.  The checks totaled approximately $229,100 in 2000; $1.19 million in 2001; $760,000 in 2002; $50,000 in 2003; and $125,000 in 2004.

The Indictment characterized the alleged sham transactions as engineered for the purpose of allowing Porath to fraudulently deduct the payments on his company’s and on his personal federal tax returns, which resulted in the reduction of taxable income.  Based upon these checks to the Brooklyn companies, Porath took false deductions on his company’s and his personal federal tax returns, allowing Porath to fraudulently reduce his taxable income. Porath is also charged with filing a false federal tax return on or about Feb. 17, 2005, which substantially understated his income.

Paying the Piper

Porath faces the following:

  • Bid Rigging:  a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, and a $1 million fine.
  • False Subscription On His Tax Return: a maximum penalty of three years in prison and a $100,000 fine.

Porath and Gosek face the following:

  • Tax Fraud Conspiracy: a maximum penalty of five years in prison, and a $250,000 fine. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victim of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine.

On November 17, 2010, Gosek pleaded guilty to one count of the three-count indictment.

On July 11, 2012, Porath pleaded guilty to the three-count indictment.

Including Porath and Gosek, 15 individuals and six companies have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to charges arising out of this federal antitrust investigation of bid rigging, fraud, bribery, and tax-related offenses relating to the award of contracts by the facilities operations department of NYPH.


 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
July 26, 2014
Broker Slips And Counter Punches Public CustomerJuly 25, 2014If you've been a stockbroker long enough, it's likely that some customer will file a laws... Read On
July 25, 2014
If you've been a stockbroker long enough, it's likely that some customer will file a lawsuit against you and your firm. Frankly, you may have screwed ... Read On
July 24, 2014
In a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Arbitration Statement of Claim filed in May 2013, public customer Claimant Meadows asserted cau... Read On
July 23, 2014
This one ain't pretty and there's sure as hell nothing here to laugh about. In 2012, a stockbroker finds himself charged with felony child molestation... Read On
July 22, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#wallstreetjobs @brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS... Read On
July 21, 2014
The customer says: Listen, I'm on the road and can't do it. Go ahead and sign my name. It's okay. The stockbroker is uneasy and asks: You su... Read On
July 19, 2014
Stockbroker Whiffs On Three Email StrikesJuly 18, 2014How nice. How convenient. Customers can actually send emails to their brokerage firms and ask fo... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration Counterclaim BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab Commission CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Department of Justice Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker RIA Prison Disclosure NASAA Aguilar FCPA Subway Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Variable Annuity Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education OIP Tax Liens Willful CE Unregistered Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Impersonator Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks RMBS PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Arrest Barclays Liens Failure To Supervise Apple Time And Price T&P Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Charge Sexist NML Argentina Embezzlement Silver Judgment Bank Fraud Deceased TSSB Trustee Frumento Conspiracy 6th Circuit Proctor Rule 3040 Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Compromise Website TRO Supervision SDNY Piwowar Rule 1122 Article V signature VA Rule 3270 OWB
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+