An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Classic FINRA Case Of A Stockbroker Borrowing From A Client
Written: July 18, 2012

Loan

For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), without admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any issue, Gregory M. Viechnicki submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (“AWC”), which FINRA accepted. In the Matter of Gregory M. Viechnicki, Respondent (AWC 2011026685501, July 13, 2012).

In March 1999, Viechnicki entered the industry in a registered capacity and during the relevant time of 2009 through October 6, 2010, was a General Securities Representative with FINRA member firm BrokersXpress LLC. The AWC asserts that Viechnicki had no prior FINRA disciplinary history.

On about April 6, 2010, Viechnicki borrowed $10,000 from a customer and, subsequently, fully repaid the loan with interest in installment payments on May 2010 and October 2010.

Unfortunately, when he borrowed the funds, BrokersXpress’s procedures generally prohibited representatives from borrowing money from a customer, subject to the option to seek an exception pursuant to a prior request for the firm’s written approval.  Viechnicki did not seek or obtain such prior approval and did not disclose that he had borrowed money from the firm’s customers.

For the reasons cited above, the FINRA alleged that Viechnicki borrowed money from a customer in contravention of his firm’s written policies and without prior disclosure in violation of NASD Conduct Rule 2370: Borrowing From or Lending to Customers and FINRA Rule 2010: Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade.  In accordance with the terms of the AWC, FINRA imposed upon Viechnicki a $2,500 fine and a 10-business-day suspension from association with any FINRA member in any capacity.

Bill Singer‘s Comment

Rarely do we get such a short, sweet, and simple case as this — and it offers us a unique opportunity to answer one of the most basic questions: What’s the going rate from FINRA for a Borrowing violation where there’s only one loan, it’s fully repaid, and the broker has no prior history?  The answer — at least according to this case — is a $2,500 fine and 10-business-day suspension. Of course, rarely are these case so straightforward and often involve additional violations or complicating facts; however, for one brief, shining moment, we have the distillate in its purest form.

This issue has hit Wall Street hard since the onset of the Great Recession, and has not discriminated among large or small firms. Amidst a souring economy, the loss of commission business, and the closing of firms and branches, whether employed atMerrill LynchMorgan Stanley, JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, UBS, or smaller firms, the need for cash pushed many brokers to the limit and prompted arrangements with customers to borrow money. The legacy of those ongoing hard times will likely keep this violation on the front burner at FINRA for years to come.

Given how brief this column is, let’s take advantage of the opportunity to present in full text, the current FINRA Borrowing Rule:

FINRA Rule 3240: Borrowing From or Lending to Customers

(a) Permissible Lending Arrangements; Conditions

No person associated with a member in any registered capacity may borrow money from or lend money to any customer of such person unless:

(1) the member has written procedures allowing the borrowing and lending of money between such registered persons and customers of the member;

(2) the borrowing or lending arrangement meets one of the following conditions:

(A) the customer is a member of such person’s immediate family;

(B) the customer (i) is a financial institution regularly engaged in the business of providing credit, financing, or loans, or other entity or person that regularly arranges or extends credit in the ordinary course of business and (ii) is acting in the course of such business;

(C) the customer and the registered person are both registered persons of the same member;

(D) the lending arrangement is based on a personal relationship with the customer, such that the loan would not have been solicited, offered, or given had the customer and the registered person not maintained a relationship outside of the broker-customer relationship; or

(E) the lending arrangement is based on a business relationship outside of the broker-customer relationship; and

(3) the requirements of paragraph (b) of this Rule are satisfied.

(b) Notification and Approval

(1) The registered person shall notify the member of the borrowing or lending arrangements described in paragraphs (a)(2)(C), (D), and (E) above prior to entering into such arrangements and the member shall pre-approve in writing such arrangements. The registered person shall also notify the member and the member shall pre-approve in writing any modifications to such arrangements, including any extension of the duration of such arrangements.

(2) With respect to the borrowing or lending arrangements described in paragraph (a)(2)(A) above, a member’s written procedures may indicate that registered persons are not required to notify the member or receive member approval either prior to or subsequent to entering into such borrowing or lending arrangements.

(3) With respect to the borrowing or lending arrangements described in paragraph (a)(2)(B) above, a member’s written procedures may indicate that registered persons are not required to notify the member or receive member approval either prior to or subsequent to entering into such borrowing or lending arrangements, provided that, the loan has been made on commercial terms that the customer generally makes available to members of the general public similarly situated as to need, purpose and creditworthiness. For purposes of this subparagraph, the member may rely on the registered person’s representation that the terms of the loan meet the above-described standards.

(c) Definition of Immediate Family

The term “immediate family” means parents, grandparents, mother-in-law or father-in-law, husband or wife, brother or sister, brother-in-law or sister-in-law, son-in law or daughter-in-law, children, grandchildren, cousin, aunt or uncle, or niece or nephew, and any other person whom the registered person supports, directly or indirectly, to a material extent.

Supplementary Material

.01 Record Retention. For purposes of paragraph (b)(1) of this Rule, members shall preserve the written pre-approval for at least three years after the date that the borrowing or lending arrangement has terminated or for at least three years after the registered person’s association with the member has terminated.


 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
June 18, 2013
Maybe they gotta rethink the whole idea about having one person working at both a brokerage firm and its banking affiliate. If you go by some recent c... Read On
June 18, 2013
EMPLOYMENT TUESDAY AT BROKEANDBROKER.COMStockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsVisit the BrokeAndBroker Employment Page BrokeAnd... Read On
June 17, 2013
On the morning of December 18, 1992, two brothers were shot and killed in their Houston, TX, home. There were no witnesses to the murders, but a neigh... Read On
June 17, 2013
On October 26, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filed a Complaint in SEC v. Andrey C. Hicks and Locust Offshore Management, L... Read On
June 16, 2013
On June 11, 2013, Dan Jamieson of InvestmentNews appears to have broken the story that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's ("FINRA's") Distr... Read On
June 14, 2013
What happens when you mix Wall Street and politics, and add to that volatile mix an elderly individual? All that I can tell you is that it's not a pre... Read On
June 14, 2013
The way things have devolved on Wall Street, we pretty much have come to accept that a lot of industry professional steal from their public customers.... Read On
June 13, 2013
For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), without admitting or de... Read On
June 13, 2013
You got your brokerage customer with a will and/or a trust. You got your customer's stockbroker, who becomes an executor, a trustee, or a beneficiary.... Read On
June 12, 2013
In September 2007, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) (the successor to the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD... Read On
June 12, 2013
Sometime around April 2010 through September 2011, Janamjot Singh Sodhi, aka Jimmy Singh fraudulently solicited investments through a firm he owned (E... Read On
June 12, 2013
At first blush, it was a relatively modest business. Initially, it was thought that from February 2004 to April 2008, Naveed Sheikh made over $265,000... Read On
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Bonus TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund Smith Barney Lehman Brothers IC3 Scottrade Lehman Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL US Airways MSSB SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Merrill Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING OTR Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Annuity FNMA TIC DWI Suitability POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker Prison NASAA FCPA Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Deutsche Bank HSBC Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Outside Account Options Telephone Social Media ADA Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education Impersonation Annuities ETF Mail Fraud Signatures BitTorrent Crowdfunding Away Accounts Dodd Frank Checks Solicited Unsolicited Congress Wife Bank Discretion Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement Chase Investment Services Barclays Willful T&P Husband Knight Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Test Bank Fraud TSSB Trustee NYAG
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn