An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Exonerated Stockbroker Remains Victimized In Public Customer Arbitration
Written: October 8, 2012

Giant Gavel

Public customer Perez filed a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Arbitration Statement of Claim in February 2011 asserting, among other causes of action, breaches of contract and fiduciary duty; failure to supervise; and negligence in connection with the purchase of various Puerto Rican bank-issued preferred stocks in his account. Although Claimant Perez initially sought $264,000 in compensatory damages plus fees and costs, by the hearing’s close he had reduced his demand to between $95,606.01 and $133,550.67. In the Matter of the FINRA Arbitration Between Carlos Lopez Perez, Claimant, vs. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., and Juan Carios Estarellas Sabater, Respondents(FINRA Arbitration 11-00758, October 4, 2012).

Respondents Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Estarellas Sabater generally denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses. Respondents also sought the expungement of this matter from the Central Registration Depository record (the “CRD”) of Respondent Estarellas Sabater.

Award

The FINRA Arbitration Panel found Respondent CGMI liable and ordered it to pay to Claimant Perez $25,000 in compensatory damages and a $300.00 in filing fee reimbursement.

Respondent Estarellas Sabater was found not liable and Claimant’s claims against him were dismissed with prejudice.  Further, the Panel recommended the expungement of the arbitration from Respondent Estarellas Sabater’s CRD, and noted that:

The Panel heard clear and convincing evidence that not only did the registered person not recommend the subject investment product to Claimant, but had recommended alternative investment products and an alternative investment strategy to Claimant. It was clear to the Panel from the evidence presented at the hearing, that Claimant rejected the alternative investment strategy and products recommended by the registered person.

Bill Singer‘s Comment

According to online FINRA documents as of October 8, 2012, the issues involved in this arbitration are more fully explained as:

CLAIMANT ALLEGES THAT BEGINNING IN 09/06 THROUGH 11/5/07, He RELIED ON MR. ESTARELLAS’ ADVISE [SIC]. CLAIMANT PURCHASED EQUIRY [SIC] AND OTC STOCKS AND GOVERNMENT AND MUNICIPAL BONDS. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE VALUE OF THE INVESTMENTS DECLINED. CLAIMANT ALLEGES UNSUITABLIILTY, NEGLIGENCE, VIOLATION OF PUERTO RICO’S REGULATION #6078 AND MISREPRESENTATION

Okay, why the Arbitration Decision couldn’t present us with at least as much relevant background as FINRA’s online broker database escapes me but it’s a common complaint that I raise — so I’m not exactly surprised.  Regardless, given the fairly horrific charges that for over a year Claimant Perez was, in essence, victimized by Respondent Estarellas Sabater’s allegedly unsuitable and negligent misrepresentations, it’s shocking that the outcome of this case presents a very, very different version of events.

Despite the public customer’s finger pointing at Estarellas Sabater, the arbitrators found that the stockbroker didn’t recommend the subject investment products to Claimant.  Even more in the way of refutation, the arbitrators concluded that the public customer had  rejected the alternative investment strategy and products recommended by Estarellas Sabater.  I’m not sure how much further any FINRA arbitration panel could have gone to exonerate any given stockbroker.  Frankly, notwithstanding the monetary award to the public customer as solely against Respondent CGMI — we seem to have two distinct victims: the public customer Perez and the stockbroker Estarella Sabater.

I can hazard any number of scenaria supporting an outcome in which a public customer wins against a respondent brokerage firm but not against the servicing stockbroker. Of course, in order to come up with some possible explanation requires me to take on the role of a contestant on a quiz show, which ought not be the game rules for a FINRA Arbitration Decision.  Truly, I wish that this Arbitration Panel had explained in some detail why it awarded $25,000 to the public customer but exonerated the stockbroker?  What exactley was misrepresented and by whom to the customer?

Ultimately, I have no doubt that Respondent Estarellas Sabater was wrongly named because the Decision says as much.  Which leads me to wonder why he also didn’t counterclaim against the public customer for damages.  It’s one thing if the dispute presented “debatable” allegations by the customer against the stockbroker but here, the Panel tells us that it wasn’t even close. In this case, the Panel says that:

  1. the stockbroker did not recommend the securities at issue; and
  2. the stockbroker’s recommended strategy and products were pointedly rejected by the public customer.

I ask, yet again, why didn’t the stockbroker sue the customer by way of counterclaim?


 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
July 3, 2015
On Sunday July 5th, Greeks will be going to the polls -- at least as of the writing of this column -- and voting whether to accept the terms of the pr... Read On
July 2, 2015
Offered for your consideration today in the BrokeAndBroker.com Blog is a thought piece. On one side, we have the goose: An individual human being conv... Read On
July 1, 2015
If you're going to promise a Wall Street regulator that you will fix a problem, you better make certain -- in fact, you better make damn cer... Read On
June 30, 2015
In "SEC Commissioner Gallagher Rages Against The Dying Light In Two Dissents" (BrokeAndBroker.com, June 18, 2015), I noted that:After four years ... Read On
June 30, 2015
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#wallstreetjobs @brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS: Brok... Read On
June 29, 2015
On June 26, 2015, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") published this somewhat unusual and intriguing press release:FINRA Supports NA... Read On
June 27, 2015
BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court Rules On Gay MarriageIn Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department Of Health, et. al (Slip Opinion,... Read On
June 26, 2015
In Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department Of Health, et. al (Slip Opinion, Supreme Court, No. 14–556; 576 U. S. ____ / June ... Read On
June 26, 2015
During my three decades on Wall Street (which has included stints as an industry regulator, industry defense lawyer, and public customers' lawyer), I'... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search


Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration Counterclaim BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Criminal Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se PCAOB Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab Commission CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Countrywide Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers SIPC IC3 Scottrade AIG Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Department of Justice Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Thain Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 Eligibility RRBDlaw 8210 Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson Cellphone US Airways JPM BrokeandBroker Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Rule 3050 Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Fifth Amendment Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon CGMI Failure to Supervise Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Charity Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity Expense Reimbursement FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker Deferred Compensation RIA Prison Disclosure NASAA Aguilar FCPA Subway Testimony Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank Hospital Retirement Due Process God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud FINOP CCO Compliance Audit Test Examination Cheating Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Reuters Retaliation Variable Annuity Arbitraiton Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Series 7 Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA Disability MetLife Continuing Education OIP Tax Liens Willful CE Unregistered Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Impersonator Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks RMBS AML PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Password Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement Money Market employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Arrest Barclays Liens Obamacare Failure To Supervise Apple Time And Price T&P Willfully Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Debit Card Knight Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Data Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Charge Commodities Fraud Sexist NML Argentina Embezzlement Silver Investor Alert Evidence Judgment Bank Fraud Deceased Bill Singer BrokeAndBroker TSSB OHO Leveraged ETF Mary Jo White Trustee FINRA AWC Motion To Dismiss Frumento Conspiracy 6th Circuit Proctor Commissioner Stein 401(k) Rule 3040 Customer Files Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman 11th Circuit Insurance Gallagher White Self Regulation Short Sale Compromise Website Rule 2010 Check TRO Supervision Vacatur Remand SDNY Rule 12206 BrokeAndBroker Bill Singer Piwowar Stifel Rule 1122 Article V signature Confidential Inside Information Reg SP VA Leveraged ETFs Regulation SP Fees Cease And Desist Customer Rule 3270 Rule 3240 Annual Compliance Questionnaire OWB 2Cir Red Flags Payroll Stockbrokers ALJ Cybercrime Loans BrokerCheck Altered Records
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+