An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Exonerated Stockbroker Remains Victimized In Public Customer Arbitration
Written: October 8, 2012

Giant Gavel

Public customer Perez filed a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Arbitration Statement of Claim in February 2011 asserting, among other causes of action, breaches of contract and fiduciary duty; failure to supervise; and negligence in connection with the purchase of various Puerto Rican bank-issued preferred stocks in his account. Although Claimant Perez initially sought $264,000 in compensatory damages plus fees and costs, by the hearing’s close he had reduced his demand to between $95,606.01 and $133,550.67. In the Matter of the FINRA Arbitration Between Carlos Lopez Perez, Claimant, vs. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., and Juan Carios Estarellas Sabater, Respondents(FINRA Arbitration 11-00758, October 4, 2012).

Respondents Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Estarellas Sabater generally denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses. Respondents also sought the expungement of this matter from the Central Registration Depository record (the “CRD”) of Respondent Estarellas Sabater.


The FINRA Arbitration Panel found Respondent CGMI liable and ordered it to pay to Claimant Perez $25,000 in compensatory damages and a $300.00 in filing fee reimbursement.

Respondent Estarellas Sabater was found not liable and Claimant’s claims against him were dismissed with prejudice.  Further, the Panel recommended the expungement of the arbitration from Respondent Estarellas Sabater’s CRD, and noted that:

The Panel heard clear and convincing evidence that not only did the registered person not recommend the subject investment product to Claimant, but had recommended alternative investment products and an alternative investment strategy to Claimant. It was clear to the Panel from the evidence presented at the hearing, that Claimant rejected the alternative investment strategy and products recommended by the registered person.

Bill Singer‘s Comment

According to online FINRA documents as of October 8, 2012, the issues involved in this arbitration are more fully explained as:


Okay, why the Arbitration Decision couldn’t present us with at least as much relevant background as FINRA’s online broker database escapes me but it’s a common complaint that I raise — so I’m not exactly surprised.  Regardless, given the fairly horrific charges that for over a year Claimant Perez was, in essence, victimized by Respondent Estarellas Sabater’s allegedly unsuitable and negligent misrepresentations, it’s shocking that the outcome of this case presents a very, very different version of events.

Despite the public customer’s finger pointing at Estarellas Sabater, the arbitrators found that the stockbroker didn’t recommend the subject investment products to Claimant.  Even more in the way of refutation, the arbitrators concluded that the public customer had  rejected the alternative investment strategy and products recommended by Estarellas Sabater.  I’m not sure how much further any FINRA arbitration panel could have gone to exonerate any given stockbroker.  Frankly, notwithstanding the monetary award to the public customer as solely against Respondent CGMI — we seem to have two distinct victims: the public customer Perez and the stockbroker Estarella Sabater.

I can hazard any number of scenaria supporting an outcome in which a public customer wins against a respondent brokerage firm but not against the servicing stockbroker. Of course, in order to come up with some possible explanation requires me to take on the role of a contestant on a quiz show, which ought not be the game rules for a FINRA Arbitration Decision.  Truly, I wish that this Arbitration Panel had explained in some detail why it awarded $25,000 to the public customer but exonerated the stockbroker?  What exactley was misrepresented and by whom to the customer?

Ultimately, I have no doubt that Respondent Estarellas Sabater was wrongly named because the Decision says as much.  Which leads me to wonder why he also didn’t counterclaim against the public customer for damages.  It’s one thing if the dispute presented “debatable” allegations by the customer against the stockbroker but here, the Panel tells us that it wasn’t even close. In this case, the Panel says that:

  1. the stockbroker did not recommend the securities at issue; and
  2. the stockbroker’s recommended strategy and products were pointedly rejected by the public customer.

I ask, yet again, why didn’t the stockbroker sue the customer by way of counterclaim?


Previous Entries
March 2, 2015
Few queries get my blood more agitated than those in which a client asks my thoughts about the potential acquisition of a so-called Shell Company as p... Read On
March 2, 2015
An opportunity presents itself for you to get involved in some business deal outside of your broker-dealer.  The way you see it, your role won't ... Read On
February 28, 2015
After Credit Card Expense Suspension, Stockbroker Barred By Liens And JudgmentsIf you were lucky to dodge a regulatory bullet, don't count on your def... Read On
February 27, 2015
If you were lucky to dodge a regulatory bullet, don't count on your deft footwork to bail you out a second time.  In a recent FINRA regulatory se... Read On
February 26, 2015
Sometimes a cigar is a cigar. Sometimes a fish is a fish -- or a grouper. Sometimes, however, federal prosecutors would have you believe that a fish i... Read On
February 25, 2015
In some ways, this disaster started out admirably with a registered representative father trying to find a way to leave his book of business for his... Read On
February 24, 2015
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page Jobs#wallstreetjobs @brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS... Read On
February 23, 2015
The hotly contested, high-profile Wall Street employment lawsuit of Wile v. FINRA found the industry's self-regulatory organization defending against ... Read On Job Search

Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Morgan Keegan Arbitration Counterclaim Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX FBI Banc of America Pro Se PCAOB Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab Commission CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Countrywide Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers SIPC IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Department of Justice Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Thain Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 Eligibility RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson Cellphone US Airways JPM Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Rule 3050 Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon CGMI Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity Expense Reimbursement FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker RIA Prison Disclosure NASAA Aguilar FCPA Subway Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank Hospital Due Process God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud FINOP CCO Audit Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Reuters Retaliation Variable Annuity Arbitraiton Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Series 7 Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA Disability MetLife Continuing Education Cheating OIP Tax Liens Willful CE Unregistered Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Impersonator Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks RMBS AML PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement Money Market employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Arrest Barclays Liens Failure To Supervise Apple Time And Price T&P Willfully Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Debit Card Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Charge Sexist NML Argentina Embezzlement Silver Investor Alert Judgment Bank Fraud Deceased Bill Singer BrokeAndBroker TSSB OHO Mary Jo White Trustee Motion To Dismiss Frumento Conspiracy 6th Circuit Proctor Rule 3040 Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman 11th Circuit Insurance Gallagher White Self Regulation Short Sale Compromise Website TRO Supervision Vacatur SDNY Rule 12206 BrokeAndBroker Bill Singer Piwowar Stifel Rule 1122 Article V signature Confidential Inside Information Reg SP VA Regulation SP Customer Rule 3270 Rule 3240 Annual Compliance Questionnaire OWB 2Cir Stockbrokers Cybercrime Loans Altered Records
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+