An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Taped Phone Conversations Discredit Customer And Exonerate Stockbroker
Written: October 25, 2012

Studer tape machine

In a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Arbitration Statement of Claim filed in April 2012, Claimant Brownstein asserted the cause of action of inaccurate recording of customer information on his Central Registration Depository (the “CRD”) record. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Edward Joseph Brownstein, Claimant, vs. TD Ameritrade, Inc., Respondent (FINRA Arbitration 12-01358, October 15, 2012).  In its Answer, Respondent TD Ameritrade did not oppose the requested expungement.

Legal Fiction

Brownstein’s arbitration against TD Ameritrade is largely a derivative action that is required by FINRA’s expungement protocol.  Essentially, inBrownstein v. TD Ameritrade, Claimant is seeking the expungement of information concerning a prior settled arbitration: Fiorentino and Fiorentino, Claimant, vs. TD Ameritrade, Inc. and Edward Joseph Brownstein, III, Respondents (FINRA Arbitration 09-03936).

Prior Customer Arbitration

According to online FINRA records as of October 25, 2012, describe the customer’s allegation inFiorentino and Fiorentino as:

CLIENT ALLEGES MISREPRESENTATION AND  MATERIAL OMISSION OF FACT REGARDING PURCHASE OF MAIN STREET BONDS

Apparently, the customer alleged that he had sought stockbroker Brownstein’s assurance of bond quality and risk as part of a contemplated swap; and that the two had discussed the security, risk, and ability to pay income and to repay principal of a particular issue (Main Street) from Lehman Brothers. FINRA’s online records disclose that the client had alleged $290,000 in damages in the Arbitration Statement of Claim filed on July 13, 2009. On October 3, 2010, TD Ameritrade apparently settled the dispute for $65,000 without contribution from Brownstein.

Legal Fiction

Notwithstanding the settlement to which he did not contribute, Brownstein  apparently persisted in his belief that he was wholly innocent of the charges — if not victimized by the blot on his record — and, to put it mildly, the stockbroker’s pursuit of an expungement suggests that he was outraged by the customer’s claims. Consequently, FINRA requires that Brownstein engage in the legal fiction, as it were, of suing TD Ameritrade in order to expunge from his CRD the various assertions and allegations arising in the customer arbitration.

A Monty Python Skit?

It’s not that Brownstein has any dispute with TD Ameritrade, which didn’t even oppose his request for expungement;  it’s that FINRA requires the asinine pretense of a dispute between the broker and brokerage firm in order to justify the submission of the expungement to arbitration. One would think that there would be no place at FINRA for such Monty Python Nudge Nudge Wink Wink silliness; but, alas, there seems to be endless amounts of room for such nonsense.

And let’s not forget the added cost to the broker of having to retain a lawyer and pay FINRA arbitration filing and forum fees in order to clear his name — all the more irksome if the customer’s allegations are baseless.  Yes — I fully appreciate the historic abuses of the expungement process and recognize that there was a need to reform this process; on the other hand, the failures of a former protocol do not justify the unfairness of its replacement.

Let’s Go To The Tape

According to testimony at the expungement hearing, TD operated a recording system for all calls between its employees and anyone else, including customers. Recorded calls were purportedly preceded by a message of notice and consent. The sole FINRA Arbitrator conducting the expungement hearing listened to six tapes deemed relevant to the issues and in rendering a decision to recommend expungement, the Arbitrator provided us with his compelling rationale:

[I]t was the customer who initiated every aspect of the bond swap idea, including identifying all the bonds in his portfolio that he might sell and the bonds he might buy; notably the Lehman ” Main Street” issue of 2017 with a 5 and 14 coupon. Throughout, the customer depicted himself as a “ trader” who was self-managing his ladder of bonds,seeking increased yield in response to changes in the prices in the bond market. He was working from home using his calculator and his screen showing existing holdings details. It was the customer who originated the idea about the Main Street issue, having picked up the name from another brokerage house. The customer was shopping, getting ideas and prices from one place and then seeking availability and price quotation from TD Ameritrade.

Throughout, the customer did 90% of the talking, musing aloud as he analyzed the coupons, maturity dates, prices he had paid for older issues, and the price he hoped to pay for the new bond. His entire focus was on the elements of yield. He said he was doing this possible transaction to raise his annual cash flow by about $900.00 to $1000.00 per year. There was a brief question from him about the letter ratings of the older issue and the Main Street bonds, to which the broker replied with the letter ratings published by several rating agencies and the issuer. At no time did the customer ask about ability to repay principal. He asked about the annual schedule for interest payments and the broker responded with the dates from the bond, noting that no payment would be made for 12 months in the first year.

There was zero evidence of salesmanship by Claimant during these calls. He confined himself to reporting on availability and price.

It is demonstrably false to allege that the customer was induced to sell some of his holdings in favor of a new issue based on assurances of quality from the employee of the brokerage house. The customer sold himself on the idea, from start to finish, and did so entirely on prices, coupons, and maturity dates.

Bill Singer’s Comment

To sum it up, the FINRA Arbitrator concluded that the public customer:

  • initiated “every aspect” of the bond swap at issue;
  • originated the idea about utilizing the Lehman Main Street issue;
  • presented himself as “self-managing his ladder of bonds”; and
  • had shopped his strategy around for purposes of availability and pricing.

Further, the Arbitrator found “zero evidence of salesmanship “ by Brownstein, whose role seemed largely confined to reporting about availability and price. Moreover, in as damning an indictment of a public customer’s credibility as can be imagined within the circumstances presented in this expungement matter, the Arbitrator found it “demonstrably false that the customer was induced” into the disputed swap and, to the contrary, the adjudicator concluded that the “customer sold himself.”

One can and likely should sympathize with customers who purchased the Main Street Bond garbage backed by Lehman Brothers.  As an industry, Wall Street failed investors by failing to adequately disclose the potential conflicts and dangers of such an issue; and there’s also more than enough blame to go around in terms of Wall Street’s regulators who largely sat on the sidelines while the toxic dump of dubious issues built up and eventually crashed down upon us all.  That being said, there are “solicited” and “unsolicited” trades, and for the latter, there is only so much liability that should be borne by a stockbroker.

In the case of Auction Rate Securities (“ARS”), by way of example, many stockbrokers were told by their firms and sincerely believed that the ARS were as solid as money market funds and that the underlying auction markets were liquid and free of any history of freezing up — under such a scenario, it would be hard to condemn a stockbroker for not urging a client to avoid an unsolicited purchase of ARS.  In some sense, the same construct applied to Brownstein’s role in the Main Street Bond transaction at issue.

Also READ these “Street Sweeper” columns on FINRA expungements:


 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
October 21, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#wallstreetjobs @brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS... Read On
October 20, 2014
Once upon a time, Wall Street's regulators seemed to view so-called "Failure To Supervise" matters as a last resort -- the final arrow in a quiver. &n... Read On
October 18, 2014
Athena No Goddess Says SEC in HFT SettlementOctober 17, 2014In an effort to cultivate an orderly daily closing, ten minutes before the close at 3:50:0... Read On
October 17, 2014
In an effort to cultivate an orderly daily closing, ten minutes before the close at 3:50:00 p.m., NASDAQ releases a Net Order Imbalance Indicator, whi... Read On
October 17, 2014
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Commissioner Michael S. Piwowar and his often like-minded colleague, Commissioner Daniel Gallagher, are the... Read On
October 16, 2014
On October 15, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed an Order Instituting an Administrative Proceeding (“OIP”) against “Complianc... Read On
October 15, 2014
You should be thrilled to learn that the venerable Lloyds & Associates Management Ltd. is involved in this deal that I’m going to pitch to you. Yo... Read On
October 14, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#wallstreetjobs @brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration Counterclaim BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab Commission CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers SIPC IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Department of Justice Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 Eligibility RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity Expense Reimbursement FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker RIA Prison Disclosure NASAA Aguilar FCPA Subway Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank Hospital God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Reuters Retaliation Variable Annuity Arbitraiton Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education OIP Tax Liens Willful CE Unregistered Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Impersonator Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks RMBS AML PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement Money Market employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Arrest Barclays Liens Failure To Supervise Apple Time And Price T&P Willfully Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Debit Card Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Charge Sexist NML Argentina Embezzlement Silver Judgment Bank Fraud Deceased TSSB Mary Jo White Trustee Motion To Dismiss Frumento Conspiracy 6th Circuit Proctor Rule 3040 Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Self Regulation Short Sale Compromise Website TRO Supervision Vacatur SDNY BrokeAndBroker Bill Singer Piwowar Rule 1122 Article V signature Inside Information VA Regulation SP Customer Rule 3270 OWB Stockbrokers
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+