An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Settled Stop Loss Order Is Loss For Stockbroker
Written: November 6, 2012

A trader works in front of a board displaying ...

For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), without admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any issue, William Luther Crull, IV submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (“AWC”), which FINRA accepted. In the Matter of William Luther Crull, IV, Respondent (AWC 2010025740701, November 2, 2012).

Crull  entered the securities industry in November 1989 and was employed by FSC Securities Corporation from 2008 until December 2010.

On March 18, 2009, an FSC customer purchased 13,400 shares of the closed-end fund Morgan Stanley High Yield Fund (“MSHY”) for $50,999.42. Crull placed a stop-loss order on the MSHY position at 10% below the purchase price; and, thereafter, the MSHY fund immediately traded down, triggering the stop-loss order.  The position was sold for $47,629.21, resulting in a loss.

Oh well, ya win some, ya lose some; except, you know, that wouldn’t make for all that interesting a “Street Sweeper” column.  There had to have been something quirky that happened here.  And it did.

On that same trade date as the stop-loss sale, the market was volatile. What do volatile markets do?  Why, they go up and down and up and down. Apparently, no sooner had MSHY dropped and triggered the stop-loss then the shares reversed direction that same day and moved higher.  The AWC asserts that the reversal back up prompted the customer to purchase 13,400 shares of MSHY.

Following the trade date at issue, Crull met with the customer and the customer’s wife to explain the reason for the position’s sale, which the AWC says he attributed to “market volatility.”  The AWC asserts that the customer and his wife were not satisfied with Crull’s explanation and wanted to be compensated for the loss.

In March 2009, without FSC’s knowledge, authorization, or approval, Crull allegedly personally paid the customer $4,600, which included commissions and the loss on the MSHY trade. Further, Crull did not advise FSC of the customer’s complaint or the settlement until December 2010, in apparent violation of FINRA Rule 2010.

In accordance with the terms of the AWC, FINRA imposed upon Crull a $5,000 fine and A one-month suspension from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities.

Bill Singer‘s Comment

I’m sorry but I’m disappointed with the presentation of facts in this FINRA AWC.  For starters, much was made about the stop-loss order — all of which raises something of an implication that the order was unauthorized, but there is no such charge.  Stripped down to its essence, the customer seems to have been upset that the stop-loss was triggered — and angry enough to go back in and try to ride the shares higher.  Ah yes, the graveyard of many an investor: The Old Whipsaw.  As to whether the client sustained another loss or a profit or a push on that second MSHY position, the AWC is silent. As to why the customer rejected the stockbroker’s explanation that the stop-loss was triggered by market volatility is not explained either.  One would think that the day’s stock chart would confirm such a basic explanation.

Ultimately, for all the misdirection in the AWC, this case seems little more than a $4,600 unauthorized settlement and the failure to timely disclose same to a member firm.  Why Crull even felt compelled to pay for the losses sustained on an authorized stop-loss is not explained.

As a former Series 7/63 myself, I understand any number of likely explanations: keeping a good customer happy, feeling guilty for possibly suggesting the stop-loss, feeling guilty for possibly suggesting the trigger price, etc.  In order to make some meaningful regulatory and compliance sense out of this mess, I would have appreciated some explanation as to what prompted the undisclosed settlement and its ongoing cover-up.

The theory behind undisclosed settlements — which detractors correctly characterize as “hush money” — is that it may be sound business to reimburse the losses of a good (but presently unhappy) customer.  Quietly forking over a few hundred or thousand dollars as the cost of retaining thousands of dollars in annual commissions or fees often seems a no-brainer to many stockbrokers.  Of course the same set of facts seems a violation to many in-house compliance officers and industry regulators because it subverts, compromises, and circumvents perhaps the most critical of all first lines of defense: knowledge of a customer complaint.

Without question, this is as pandemic a problem as Wall Street has. Producers at Merrill LynchMorgan Stanley, JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, or UBS are just as likely as a counterpart at a smaller local/regional firm to go the route of handing over a relatively piddling sum to assuage an unhappy customer.  Who the hell needs to or wants to answer all those idiotic questions from those morons in compliance?  I’ll take care of this on my own and make it up with some house product or cross-selling some higher compensated crap.

While, in some instances, the customer-service goal may be commendable, unfortunately, the execution of this scenario often runs afoul of as basic a building block, a keystone as it were, of compliance and regulation as exists. Whatever the motivation behind the undisclosed payments, they tend to come off looking more like hush money than honorable reimbursement. Of course, let’s be honest here: Stockbrokers often figures it’s easier and cheaper to shut up a client before the firm finds out and before a regulator starts poking around.

In the case of William Crull IV, he paid $4,600 to settle a dispute that truly seems caused by market action rather than negligence or fraud by him.   Perhaps this would have been better handled by the stockbroker if he spoke to his firm’s management and tried to arrange for some reduced commissions or a partial settlement as against his commissions.  Regardless of where you come down on that ultimate issue, not only is Crull $4,600 out of pocket for the settlement but he got hit with a $5,000 fine and a month long suspension.

For additional cases discussing undisclosed settlements, READ:


Previous Entries
March 28, 2015
FULL TEXT Complaints And Answers in Pao v. Kleiner PerkinsOn March 27, 2015, after a month of trial testimony and three days of deliberations, a Calif... Read On
March 27, 2015
On March 27, 2015, after a month of trial testimony and three days of deliberations, a California Superior Court jury found that Plaintiff Ellen Pao... Read On
March 27, 2015
In today's Blog, we have what I often refer to as a "yes, but" case. I'm sure you have encountered such ambivalence with many matte... Read On
March 26, 2015
Wall Street is supposed to be protected by smoke detectors in the form of endless amounts of rules and regulations, massive volumes of written superv... Read On
March 25, 2015
In 2006, after suffering several miscarriages, UPS driver Peggy Young became pregnant; and, in consideration of her prior pregnancies, her doctor ins... Read On
March 25, 2015
In the great 1967 film "Cool Hand Luke," we get that iconic line about "What we've got here is failure to communicate."  The scene involves the b... Read On
March 24, 2015
On March 24, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued its Opinion in Omnicare, Inc., Et Al. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pen... Read On
March 24, 2015
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page Jobs#wallstreetjobs @brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS: Brok... Read On
March 23, 2015
Consumer advocates and regulators tend to dislike so-called "exotic" or "leveraged" Exchange Traded Funds ("ETFs"). Many of the concerns are legitimat... Read On
March 21, 2015
Merrill Lynch Blindsided By Former Employee In Promissory Note CaseThe big boys just don't tend to lose their promissory note cases with any regularit... Read On Job Search

Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Morgan Keegan Arbitration Counterclaim Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX FBI Banc of America Pro Se PCAOB Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab Commission CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Countrywide Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers SIPC IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Department of Justice Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Thain Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 Eligibility RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson Cellphone US Airways JPM Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Rule 3050 Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Fifth Amendment Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon CGMI Failure to Supervise Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity Expense Reimbursement FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker Deferred Compensation RIA Prison Disclosure NASAA Aguilar FCPA Subway Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank Hospital Due Process God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud FINOP CCO Compliance Audit Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Reuters Retaliation Variable Annuity Arbitraiton Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Series 7 Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA Disability MetLife Continuing Education Cheating OIP Tax Liens Willful CE Unregistered Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Impersonator Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks RMBS AML PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement Money Market employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Arrest Barclays Liens Failure To Supervise Apple Time And Price T&P Willfully Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Debit Card Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Charge Sexist NML Argentina Embezzlement Silver Investor Alert Judgment Bank Fraud Deceased Bill Singer BrokeAndBroker TSSB OHO Leveraged ETF Mary Jo White Trustee Motion To Dismiss Frumento Conspiracy 6th Circuit Proctor Rule 3040 Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman 11th Circuit Insurance Gallagher White Self Regulation Short Sale Compromise Website Rule 2010 TRO Supervision Vacatur Remand SDNY Rule 12206 BrokeAndBroker Bill Singer Piwowar Stifel Rule 1122 Article V signature Confidential Inside Information Reg SP VA Regulation SP Customer Rule 3270 Rule 3240 Annual Compliance Questionnaire OWB 2Cir Red Flags Payroll Stockbrokers Cybercrime Loans Altered Records
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+