An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

FULL TEXT Version of SEC's FAQ on BD Exemptions Under the JOBS Act
Written: February 5, 2013

"Street Sweeper" offers the FULL TEXT copy below of the Securities And Exchange Commission's February 5, 2013, "Frequently Asked Questions" release about Broker-Dealer exemptions under the JOBS Act:
==============================
Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act 

Frequently Asked Questions About the Exemption from Broker-Dealer Registration in Title II of the JOBS Act

Division of Trading and Markets

February 5, 2013

In these Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”), the Division of Trading and Markets (“staff”) is providing guidance on the exemption from broker-dealer registration in Title II of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (“JOBS Act”). These FAQs are not rules, regulations or statements of the Commission. The Commission has neither approved nor disapproved these FAQs.

The staff may update these questions and answers periodically. In each update, the questions added after publication of the last version will be marked with “MODIFIED” or “NEW.” In addition, the Commission is soliciting public comments on regulatory initiatives under the JOBS Act.

For Further Information Contact: Any of the following at (202) 551-5550: David W. Blass, Chief Counsel; Joseph Furey, Assistant Chief Counsel; Joanne Rutkowski, Branch Chief; or Troy Stoddard, Special Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-7010.

Background

These FAQs address questions about the exemption from broker-dealer registration in Title II of the JOBS Act.

Section 201(a)(1) of the JOBS Act directs the SEC to revise its rules issued in Rule 506 under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) to provide that the prohibition against general solicitation or general advertising contained in Securities Act Rule 502(c) shall not apply to offers and sales of securities made pursuant to Rule 506, provided that all purchasers of the securities are accredited investors. Section 201(a)(1) further states that such rules shall require the issuer to take reasonable steps to verify that purchasers of the securities are accredited investors, using such methods as determined by the Commission.

Section 201(c) of the JOBS Act adds new paragraph (b) to Section 4 of the Securities Act. Section 4(b) of the Securities Act states that:

(1) With respect to securities offered and sold in compliance with Rule 506 of Regulation D under [the Securities Act], no person who meets the conditions set forth in paragraph (2) shall be subject to registration as a broker or dealer pursuant to section 15(a)(1) of this title, solely because—

(A) that person maintains a platform or mechanism that permits the offer, sale, purchase, or negotiation of or with respect to securities, or permits general solicitation, general advertisements, or similar or related activities by issuers of such securities, whether online, in person, or through other means;

(B) that person or any person associated with that person co-invests in such securities; or

(C) that person or any person associated with that person provides ancillary services with respect to such securities.

(2) The exemption provided in paragraph (1) shall apply to any person described in such paragraph if—

(A) such person and each person associated with that person receives no compensation in connection the purchase or sale of such security;

(B) such person and each person associated with that person does not have possession of customer funds or securities in connection with the purchase or sale of such security; and

(C) such person is not subject to a statutory disqualification as defined in section 3(a)(39) of this title and does not have any person associated with that person to such a statutory disqualification.

(3) For the purposes of this subsection, the term ‘ancillary services’ means—

(A) the provision of due diligence services, in connection with the offer, sale, purchase, or negotiation of such security, so long as such services do not include, for separate compensation, investment advice or recommendations to issuers or investors; and

(B) the provision of standardized documents to the issuers and investors, so long as such person or entity does not negotiate the terms of the issuance for and on behalf of third parties and issuers are not required to use the standardized documents as a condition of using the service.

* * *

Responses to Frequently Asked Questions

Question 1.

Can I rely on the exemption from broker-dealer registration in Securities Act Section 4(b) before the SEC adopts rules to eliminate the ban in Rule 506 on general solicitation?

Answer.

Yes. The exemption from broker-dealer registration in Section 4(b) does not require the SEC to issue or adopt any rules. You cannot permit an issuer to conduct a general solicitation of a Rule 506 offering on your platform, however, until the SEC’s rules permitting those activities for a Rule 506 offering are adopted.1

Question 2.

Broker-dealers are required to register under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), but Securities Act Section 4(b) provides an exemption from the broker-dealer registration requirements in the Securities Act. Does that mean that the exemption from broker-dealer registration in Section 4(b) is not operational?

Answer.

No. Congress exempted persons described in Section 4(b) from the broker-dealer registration requirements under Section 15(a)(1) of the Exchange Act. The staff views the exemption to be fully operational.

Question 3.

Is the exemption in Section 4(b) available to a platform that offers and sells securities other than those offered and sold under Rule 506 of Regulation D?

Answer.

No. The exemption from broker-dealer registration in Securities Act Section 4(b) only applies when securities are offered and sold under Rule 506 of Regulation D.

Question 4.

Section 4(b)(1)(A) allows a person to “maintain a platform or mechanismthat permits the offer, sale, purchase, or negotiation of or with respect to securities, or permits general solicitation, general advertisements, or similar or related activities by issuers of such securities, whether online, in person, or through other means.” Would an Internet website or social media qualify as a “platform or mechanism”?

Answer.

Yes. We believe that Congress specifically intended to capture social media and Internet websites when it enacted Section 4(b)(1)(A).

Question 5.

The exemption in Securities Act Section 4(b) is not available to anyone who receives (or whose associated persons receive) “compensation in connection with the purchase or sale of such security.” What forms of compensation would cause me to be unable to rely on the exemption?

Answer.

Congress conditioned the exemption on a person and its associated persons not receiving any “compensation” in connection with the purchase or sale of such security.” Congress did not limit the condition to transaction-based compensation. The staff interprets the term “compensation” broadly, to include any direct or indirect economic benefit to the person or any of its associated persons. At the same time, we recognize that Congress expressly permitted co-investment in the securities offered on the platform or mechanism. We do not believe that profits associated with these investments would be impermissible compensation for purposes of Securities Act Section 4(b).

Question 6.

May an entity, such as a venture capital fund or its adviser, operate an Internet website where it lists offerings of securities by potential portfolio companies (in compliance with Rule 506), co-invest in those securities with other investors, and provide standardized documents for use by issuers and investors, rely on Securities Act Section 4(b) to not register as a broker-dealer?

Answer.

Yes. These activities are permitted under Section 4(b), subject to the conditions set forth in Section 4(b)(2), including the prohibition on receiving compensation in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. As a practical matter, we believe that the prohibition on compensation makes it unlikely that a person outside the venture capital area would be able to rely on the exemption from broker-dealer registration.

Question 7.

Could an associated person of an issuer of Rule 506 securities rely on the exemption under Section 4(b) to maintain a “platform or mechanism” for the issuer’s securities?

Answer.

Yes. Assuming the associated person otherwise qualifies for the exemption, including the condition prohibiting the receipt of any compensation in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, Section 4(b) does not limit the types of persons who are permitted to maintain a platform or mechanism.

Question 8.

In some instances, a complex of privately offered funds may have an internal marketing department or use the investor relations department of an affiliated adviser or other entity whose staff is paid a salary to promote, offer, and sell shares of the privately offered funds. Can these persons rely on the exemption from broker-dealer registration in Section 4(b) if the funds are offered and sold pursuant to Rule 506?

Answer.

No. Any salary paid to a person for engaging in these activities is compensation to that person in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. As a result, that person would not be able to rely on the exemption from registration as a broker-dealer provided in Section 4(b).

The Commission has previously noted that persons who market interests in a private fund may be subject to the registration requirements of Section 15(a)(1) under the Exchange Act.2

Question 9.

Does the exemption from the requirement to register as a broker-dealer mean that the persons engaging in the activities described in Section 4(b)(1) are not brokers or dealers?

Answer.

No. Section 4(b) provides an exemption from registration, not an exclusion from the definition of the term “broker” or “dealer.” Whether someone is a broker or dealer requires a separate analysis based on the particular facts and circumstances presented. The Guide to Broker-Dealer Registrationprovides staff guidance on the types of activities that may bring a person within the meaning of the term broker or dealer. Although an exemption from registration means that a person would not have to comply with obligations incumbent on a registered broker or dealer, some portions of the federal securities laws apply to brokers or dealers regardless of registration.

Question 10.

Does the exemption in Section 4(b) also provide an exemption from state registration requirements?

Answer.

No. Title II does not exempt the persons described in Section 4(b) from any state registration requirements.


1 The Commission has proposed rules to eliminate the prohibition against general solicitation and general advertising in securities offerings conducted pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act and Rule 144A under the Securities Act, as required by Section 201(a) of the JOBS Act.See Securities Act Release No. 9354 (Aug. 29, 2012), available athttp://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2012/33-9354.pdf.

2 Seee.g., Exemptions for Advisers to Venture Capital Funds, Private Fund Advisers With less Than $150 Million in Assets Under Management, and Foreign Private Advisers, Investment Advisers Act Release No. 3222 (Jun. 22, 2011) 76 FR 39646, n.9 (Jul. 6, 2011) (to be codified at 17 CFR pt. 275). 

http://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/exemption-broker-dealer-registration-jobs-act-faq.htm


 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
September 22, 2014
The dog ate my homework. My alarm clock didn't go off. I'm sick and can't get out of bed. Oh my, how many of you have resorted to one of those legenda... Read On
September 20, 2014
Citigroup Stockbroker Mauled In Strip Mall DealSeptember 19, 2014Action -- it's an interesting concept when it comes to both gambling and investing. S... Read On
September 19, 2014
Action -- it's an interesting concept when it comes to both gambling and investing. Some folks love it. Crave it. Need it. Others are looking for a wa... Read On
September 19, 2014
This is an update of "USA To Gibralter To Cayman Islands Software Scam" (BrokeAndBroker.com Blog, March 17, 2014).It's the stuff of Hollywood mee... Read On
September 18, 2014
The Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC's) human lightning rod, Commissioner Daniel M. Gallagher, is at it again -- and he's got my attention (... Read On
September 18, 2014
You know, I really get some dumb crap via spam emails, as I'm sure you all do.  Most of the time, it's some idiot trying to get me to buy Canadia... Read On
September 17, 2014
For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), without admitting or de... Read On
September 17, 2014
Ah yes, here we go again with another one of Bill Singer's infamous "Yes but . . ." columns. We start off with a somewhat oddball fact pattern in whic... Read On
September 16, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#wallstreetjobs @brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS... Read On
September 15, 2014
Sometime in February 2014, Jeffrey S. Conover sent a written complaint to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) in which he asserted t... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration Counterclaim BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab Commission CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Department of Justice Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity Reimbursement FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker RIA Prison Disclosure NASAA Aguilar FCPA Subway Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank Hospital God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Reuters Retaliation Variable Annuity Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education OIP Tax Liens Willful CE Unregistered Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Impersonator Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks RMBS AML PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement Money Market employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Arrest Barclays Liens Failure To Supervise Apple Time And Price T&P Willfully Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Debit Card Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Charge Sexist NML Argentina Embezzlement Silver Judgment Bank Fraud Deceased TSSB Mary Jo White Trustee Frumento Conspiracy 6th Circuit Proctor Rule 3040 Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Self Regulation Short Sale Compromise Website TRO Supervision Vacatur SDNY BrokeAndBroker Bill Singer Piwowar Rule 1122 Article V signature VA Regulation SP Rule 3270 OWB Stockbrokers
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+