by Bill Singer
For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations
alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), without
admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without
an adjudication of any issue, Mark David Hurwitz submitted a Letter of
Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (“AWC”), which FINRA accepted. In the Matter of Mark
David Hurwitz, Respondent (AWC 2012031504201, March 13, 2013).
In 1986, Hurwitz entered the securities industry and from
1993 through February 16. 2012, he was associated with FINRA broker-dealer
Assist Investment Management Company. Inc. The AWC asserts that Hurwitz did not
have any prior FINRA disciplinary history.
Just Sittin' In?
The AWC alleges that in February 2006. Hurwitz introduced a
customer to the owner of a real estate company called Intervest Financial Corp.
Hurwitz purportedly participated in the initial meeting between his customer
and Intervest’s owner, at which time various Intervest investments were
discussed.
Goin' South
At some point, the customer invested $500,00 in three-year
general corporate obligation bonds with 10% annual interest rates of Intervest
Commercial Mortgage Fund. Inc. In 2007, Intervest stopped making interest payments on the bonds, and the company defaulted
on its obligations.
Online FINRA records as of March 21, 2013, indicate that Assist discharged Hurwitz on February 16, 2012, based upon allegations that a:
CUSTOMER ALLEGED THAT REP MADE AN UNSUITABLE RECOMMENDATION. CUSTOMER ALSO ALLEGED THAT REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING RETURNS WERE NOT ACCURATE. FIRM TERMINATED REPRESENTATIVE AFTER INTERNAL INSPECTION LOCATED POSSIBLE OUTSIDE BUSINESS ACTIVITIES AND PRIVATE SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS.
FINRA Sits In
The AWC alleges that Hurwitz failed to provide written notice to
Assist that he was participating in the Intervest transaction away from the
firm; and, accordingly, he failed to receive the requisite written approval or
acknowledgement from his FINRA member firm for the transaction in violation of NASD
Conduct Rules 3040 and 2110.
In accordance with the terms of the AWC, FINRA imposed upon Hurwitz a $5,000 fine and a three-month suspension from from association with any FINRA broker-dealer in any capacity.
Bill Singer's CommentNASD Conduct Rule 3040:
Private Securities Transactions of an Associated Person(a) Applicability
No person associated with a member shall participate in any manner in a private securities transaction except in accordance with the requirements of this Rule.
(b) Written Notice
Prior to participating in any private securities transaction, an associated person shall provide written notice to the member with which he is associated describing in detail the proposed transaction and the person's proposed role therein and stating whether he has received or may receive selling compensation in connection with the transaction; provided however that, in the case of a series of related transactions in which no selling compensation has been or will be received, an associated person may provide a single written notice.
(c) Transactions for Compensation
(1) In the case of a transaction in which an associated person has received or may receive selling compensation, a member which has received notice pursuant to paragraph (b) shall advise the associated person in writing stating whether the member:
(A) approves the person's participation in the proposed transaction; or
(B) disapproves the person's participation in the proposed transaction.
Also READ these Private Securities Transaction articles by Bill Singer:(2) If the member approves a person's participation in a transaction pursuant to paragraph (c)(1), the transaction shall be recorded on the books and records of the member and the member shall supervise the person's participation in the transaction as if the transaction were executed on behalf of the member.
(3) If the member disapproves a person's participation pursuant to paragraph (c)(1), the person shall not participate in the transaction in any manner, directly or indirectly.
(d) Transactions Not for Compensation
In the case of a transaction or a series of related transactions in which an associated person has not and will not receive any selling compensation, a member which has received notice pursuant to paragraph (b) shall provide the associated person prompt written acknowledgment of said notice and may, at its discretion, require the person to adhere to specified conditions in connection with his participation in the transaction.
(e) Definitions
For purposes of this Rule, the following terms shall have the stated meanings:
(1) "Private securities transaction" shall mean any securities transaction outside the regular course or scope of an associated person's employment with a member, including, though not limited to, new offerings of securities which are not registered with the Commission, provided however that transactions subject to the notification requirements of Rule 3050, transactions among immediate family members (as defined in Rule 2790), for which no associated person receives any selling compensation, and personal transactions in investment company and variable annuity securities, shall be excluded.
(2) "Selling compensation" shall mean any compensation paid directly or indirectly from whatever source in connection with or as a result of the purchase or sale of a security, including, though not limited to, commissions; finder's fees; securities or rights to acquire securities; rights of participation in profits, tax benefits, or dissolution proceeds, as a general partner or otherwise; or expense reimbursements.
- Wells Fargo Broker Fined And Suspended For REIT Customer Referral
- Stockbroker’s Outside Business Activity Becomes FINRA Private Securities Transaction
- FINRA Trifecta Earns Stockbroker Fine And Suspension For Borrowing, U4, Private Securities Transactions
- FOREX Private Securities Transactions Earn Stockbroker Fine And Suspension
- Commonwealth Stockbroker's Private Securities Transaction and Customer Loan Prove Boiling Frog Story