An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Lehman Largely Wins A Promissory Note Collection Case In FINRA Arbitration
Written: June 25, 2012

LONDON, ENGLAND - SEPTEMBER 24:  Two employees...

It’s a preamble that I’ve written before and it’s one that I may yet repeat a few more times before the collection efforts are done. As such, let’s roll the tape:

Once upon a time, way back when as it now seems, Lehman Brothers one of the big four of Wall Street — alongside Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Merrill Lynch. Then, life, as we knew it, ended.

This story is part of the process in which many folks with large brooms are cleaning up after the circus parade of those days moves on.

“Street Sweeper” has reported on Lehman Brothers, Inc.’s attempts to collect on millions of dollars in promissory notes that it had extended to a number of its employees:

In the once halcyon days of Wall Street, Lehman Brothers Inc. (LBI), the broker-dealer subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc. (LBHI), gave 113 of its employees about $80 million in loans. If you look at the dates of the promissory notes involved, they go as far back as 1998 and as recently as August 2008, just before Wall Street imploded. On September 15, 2008, LBHI filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which was the largest in the nation’s history. However, before that enormous blast, those 113 LBI employees managed to get about $700,000 each. . .

Comes December 2009, amidst the shards of what once was, LBHI entered into a stipulation with its debtors and LBI as part of the Securities Investors Protection Act (SIPA) liquidation of LBI. Based upon court papers, those 113 notes had a net balance due of about $51 million and were deemed to be LBHI’s to collect.  Pre- or post-Great Recession, no one is going to walk away from $51 million. ”High Noon for 113 Former Lehman Employees“ (“Street Sweeper” February 15, 2011).

Also see, “Lehman Seeks To Collect Unpaid Loans From Furious Former Employees” (“ Street Sweeper”, November 19, 2010).

Several months ago, I reported about Lehman Brothers’ first loss in regard to its efforts to collect on promissory notes allegedly owed by former employees.  ”Lehman Suffers First Loss In FINRA Arbitration Collection of Promissory Notes” (“ Street Sweeper” October 12, 2011).   Also see, Lehman Brothers Loses Another FINRA Promissory Note Collection Case” (“ Street Sweeper” May 7, 2012).  Then there was this recent reversal: “Lehman Loses Another Promissory Note Collection Case” (“ Street Sweeper” June 11, 2012).

New FINRA Arbitration

In a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Arbitration Statement of Claim filed in September 2010, Claimant LBHI asserted breach of contract and unjust enrichment in furtherance of its efforts to collect on a promissory note issued to Respondent Kramer. Claimant LBHI sought $456,918.79 in principal due on the note plus interest accruing at the rate of $38.16 per day; and also sought attorneys’ fee, costs, expenses, and other fees. In the Matter of the FINRA Arbitration Between Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., as assignee of Lehman Brothers Inc.,Claimant/Counter-Respondent, vs. Kevin R. Kramer, Respondent/Counter-Claimant (FINRA 10-04115, June 21, 2012).

Respondent Kramer generally denied the allegations, asserted various affirmative defenses, and filed a Counter Claim asserting misrepresentations and omissions, as well as other alleged wrongful conduct. Respondent sought at least $450,000 in compensation, attorneys’ fee, and costs.

The FINRA Arbitration Panel found Respondent Kramer liable to and ordered him to pay to Respondent LBHI $428,571.43 in compensatory damages and $86,212.93 attorneys’ fees.

The FINRA Arbitration Panel found Claimant LBHI liable to and ordered it to pay to Respondent Kramer $83,794.61, which includes interest.

Consequently, the Panel rendered a net award to Claimant LBHI in the amount of $344,776.82 plus 3% per annum interest accruing from September 15, 2008, until payment in full; and an additional $86,212.93 in attorneys’ fees.

Bill Singer‘s Comment

Yup, we got every variation imaginable. LBHI wins, loses, and gets a mixed result.  In this most recent combat, the firm lost about eighty thousand as an offset to its former employee but offset that offset with a slight larger attorneys’ fee award.

What accounts for the spectrum of results?  Most likely it’s a toss up of several factors that sometimes vary in their respective weightings.  Among the usual suspects are the lawyers involved, the composition of the Arbitration Panel, the demeanor of the parties, what the arbitrators had for breakfast or whether they’re younger or older than the former employee or whether they’re in a good mood that day or just learned that their son was laid off by a bank holding company and is moving home.  If you think I’m kidding, go ask some other veteran Wall Street arbitration attorneys.  Sometimes the outcomes in these cases have little to do with the facts and more to do with indigestion.


 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
April 1, 2015
At first blush, the FINRA AWC discussed in today's BrokeAndBroker.com Blog seems a commendable effort by FINRA to delve into matters involvi... Read On
March 31, 2015
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#wallstreetjobs@brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS: BrokeA... Read On
March 30, 2015
For 20 years, one registered person timely and fully disclosed her outside business activity to her employer FINRA member firm. Inexplicably, a few ye... Read On
March 28, 2015
FULL TEXT Complaints And Answers in Pao v. Kleiner PerkinsOn March 27, 2015, after a month of trial testimony and three days of deliberations, a Calif... Read On
March 27, 2015
On March 27, 2015, after a month of trial testimony and three days of deliberations, a California Superior Court jury found that Plaintiff Ellen Pao... Read On
March 27, 2015
In today's BrokeAndBroker.com Blog, we have what I often refer to as a "yes, but" case. I'm sure you have encountered such ambivalence with many matte... Read On
March 26, 2015
Wall Street is supposed to be protected by smoke detectors in the form of endless amounts of rules and regulations, massive volumes of written superv... Read On
March 25, 2015
In 2006, after suffering several miscarriages, UPS driver Peggy Young became pregnant; and, in consideration of her prior pregnancies, her doctor ins... Read On
March 25, 2015
In the great 1967 film "Cool Hand Luke," we get that iconic line about "What we've got here is failure to communicate."  The scene involves the b... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search


Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration Counterclaim BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se PCAOB Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab Commission CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Countrywide Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers SIPC IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Department of Justice Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Thain Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 Eligibility RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson Cellphone US Airways JPM Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Rule 3050 Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Fifth Amendment Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon CGMI Failure to Supervise Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity Expense Reimbursement FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker Deferred Compensation RIA Prison Disclosure NASAA Aguilar FCPA Subway Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank Hospital Due Process God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud FINOP CCO Compliance Audit Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Reuters Retaliation Variable Annuity Arbitraiton Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Series 7 Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA Disability MetLife Continuing Education Cheating OIP Tax Liens Willful CE Unregistered Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Impersonator Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks RMBS AML PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement Money Market employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Arrest Barclays Liens Failure To Supervise Apple Time And Price T&P Willfully Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Debit Card Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Charge Sexist NML Argentina Embezzlement Silver Investor Alert Judgment Bank Fraud Deceased Bill Singer BrokeAndBroker TSSB OHO Leveraged ETF Mary Jo White Trustee Motion To Dismiss Frumento Conspiracy 6th Circuit Proctor Rule 3040 Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman 11th Circuit Insurance Gallagher White Self Regulation Short Sale Compromise Website Rule 2010 TRO Supervision Vacatur Remand SDNY Rule 12206 BrokeAndBroker Bill Singer Piwowar Stifel Rule 1122 Article V signature Confidential Inside Information Reg SP VA Regulation SP Customer Rule 3270 Rule 3240 Annual Compliance Questionnaire OWB 2Cir Red Flags Payroll Stockbrokers Cybercrime Loans Altered Records
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+