An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Deleted AOL Mail Lands Stockbroker In FINRA Trash Folder
Written: August 10, 2012

Image representing AOL as depicted in CrunchBase

You got mail!

In response to the filing of a Complaint on March 29, 2012, by the Department of Enforcement of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), Respondent Richard H. Wurz submitted an Offer of Settlement dated July 18, 2012, which the regulator accepted.  Under the terms of the Offer of Settlement, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, Respondent Wurz consented to the entry of findings and violations and to the imposition of the sanctions.FINRA Department of Enforcement, Complainant, vs Richard H. Wurz,Respondent (Offer of Settlement, 2011027621701, August 2, 2012).

Wurz first became registered in April 1985 as an Investment Company and Variable Contracts Products Representative. From June 2004 to the present, he has been registered in that capacity through member firm Fortune Financial Services. Inc.

E-mail Policies

During the relevant time period from at least January 1, 2010, through April 19, 2011, Fortune Financial Services’s internal written policies required all securities representatives to use their firm-assigned e-mail address for all business-related e-mails. Personal e-mail accounts and addresses were prohibited for any business-related communications.  Fortune retained a vendor to maintain and preserve the firm’s business related e-mails, and, accordingly, this vendor archived and preserved associated person’s e-mails that were sent and received through their assigned firm e-mail addresses.

Now You See It,

On or about April 19, 2011, two FINRA examiners arrived at Wurz’s Holland, OH office (where he worked alone) in order to conduct a branch office examination. Wurz used a computer that he owned for conducting his securities business and for other purposes. On the day of the examiners’s visit and prior, Wurz maintained an AOL e-mail account, and one of the examiners asked to review the e-mails contained in his personal AOL account.

The review occurred in a conference room located in Wurz’s office and using his computer, which he controlled and operated during the examiner’s review of the AOL e-mails. Throughout the relevant time period. Wurz had been assigned and provided with a Fortune Financial e-mail address for the receipt and transmission of business-related emails, but this AOL account was not a company-assigned or approved e-mail address.

During FINRA’s on-site examination, the examiner preliminarily reviewed e-mails in the AOL account’s Inbox and found a few e-mails that appeared business-related, and the examiner asked Wurz to print those out, which was done– thereupon, the examiner went to retrieve them from the remote printer, which was located in a separate room. TheOffer of Settlement alleges that while the examiner was out of the conference room, Wurz deleted all of the Inbox e-mails.

Now You Don’t

Upon returning to the conference room, the FINRA examiner discovered that all of the Inbox e-mails that were displayed on the screen before he went to the printer room were missing from that box and asked Wurz for an explanation.  The AWC alleges that Wurz claimed to not know what had happened and offered no explanation.

Uh huh. Yup. OkayI mean, you know, at this point, we all sort of know that this isn’t exactly going to end well for Wurz, right?

Undaunted, the FINRA examiner asked Wurz to open the Deleted AOL folder, where the emails that had formerly been in the Inbox were now displayed.

Gee, what a shock, the Inbox messages suddenly, miraculously, inexplicably wound up in the Deleted folder.  Talk about Deus Ex Machina. Hmmm . . . y’all wondering how the files in the Inbox got into the Deleted folder?  Maybe it’s one of those computer glitches that seems to be going around from NASDAQ to Knight and maybe to Wurz?

Deja Vu Again

At that point, the intrepid FINRA examiner continued to review Wurz’s AOL email and discovered additional messages that appeared business-related and again asked Wurz about them.  Once again the examiner left the conference room to retrieve the new crop of emails from the remote printer, and, once again, upon his return he discovered that the contents of the Deleted AOL folder had been deleted — as in sent to trash. And, yet again, Wurz claimed no knowledge as to what had happened.

Oh, for godsakes, really??? Ya gotta be kiddin’ me. No? Wow.

FINRA Points (Gives) A Finger

FINRA alleged that Wurz had purposely deleted the e-mails from his AOL Inbox and then purposely deleted them from the Deleted folder. Such conduct was deemed to have interfered with FINRA’s review of the subject e-mails and inhibited the staff’s ability to conduct its investigation. Further, the e-mails contained in Wurz’s personal AOL account were allegedly business related, and Wurz was using that account without his firm’s knowledge or consent. Similarly, those e-mails were business records that the firm was required to maintain and preserve under ’34 Act Rule 17a-4 and NASD Conduct Rule 3110, which Wurz’s conduct prevented. By intentionally deleting e-mails from his personal AOL account, thereby impeding FINRA’s branch office examination and regulatory oversight of his business activities, FINRA alleged that Wurz  violated FINRA Rule 2010. Also, his conduct short-circuited Fortune Financial’s ability to review the subject correspondence as required by NASD Conduct Rule 3010(d)(2).

In accordance with the terms of the Offer of Settlement, FINRA imposed upon Wurz a $5,000 fine and a two-month suspension from association with any FINRA member in any capacity.

Bill Singer‘s Comment

Is it just me?  Or doesn’t the sanction in this case seem a bit light?  The $5,000 fine is okay but only a two-month suspension?  What the hell does a broker have to do these days in order to really get hit with some vacation time — lie to FINRA, hide records, delete records?  Oh, wait, that sort of happened here, right?  Whatever the explanation, I’m unable to reconcile the misconduct with the sanctions.  Perhaps Wurz was represented by a superb lawyer or FINRA has somewhat overstated the facts.  Regardless, the facts are fairly stark and I was anticipating a heavier hand from FINRA.

Whether or not the sanctions meet the violations, the FINRA examiner in this case should be commended for staying on top of things during the on-site examination.  Although I often criticize FINRA (and my discomfort with the sanctions imposed is but one example), I found this AWC to be very well written because it offered sufficient detail about the underlying events.  Similarly, the level of detail offered by the regulator in the settlement document serves to educate the industry as to how these things actually happen, how they are detected, the silly self-help measures that registered persons should avoid, and the cascade of regulatory consequence that may result from seemingly innocuous efforts to avoid a regulator’s detection.  In Wurz, FINRA makes its case forcibly 

With smartphones, portable tablets, and all sorts of wireless devices becoming prevalent in our daily lives, the issues raised in Wurz are going to become far more common concerns for Wall Street‘s regulators and industry compliance professionals.  The mandatory use of firm-approved platforms and email addresses is easily diverted by the iPhone held under the desk or the iPad used at the local lunch spot.  Similarly, while an employer may prohibit all unauthorized access and impose a number of online blocks, it requires little more effort than logging on to Facebook or Twitter to circumvent many of the best intentions of an employer’s online supervision.

Frankly, based upon what I know, this is a widespread and growing issue that impacts Wall Street’s small fry as well as larger firms such as Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and their ilk. Whether mega-holding companies, their brokerage subsidiaries, or indie/regional players, the aspiration of controlling online conduct is often thwarted by the ingenuity of men and women armed with little more than a wireless phone or tablet.  This will be an ongoing battle between compliance departments and registered persons for years to come.

Additional Reading


Topics: AOL  Email  FINRA  Wurz  Bill Singer  BrokeAndBroker  
 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
July 23, 2014
This one ain't pretty and there's sure as hell nothing here to laugh about. In 2012, a stockbroker finds himself charged with felony child molestation... Read On
July 22, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#wallstreetjobs @brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS... Read On
July 21, 2014
The customer says: Listen, I'm on the road and can't do it. Go ahead and sign my name. It's okay. The stockbroker is uneasy and asks: You su... Read On
July 19, 2014
Stockbroker Whiffs On Three Email StrikesJuly 18, 2014How nice. How convenient. Customers can actually send emails to their brokerage firms and ask fo... Read On
July 18, 2014
How nice. How convenient. Customers can actually send emails to their brokerage firms and ask for all sorts of things. Gone are the days of voicemail ... Read On
July 18, 2014
It's not always about the fireworks at trial.  Sometimes, the pyrotechnics of the motion practice leading up to the first day of testimony determ... Read On
July 17, 2014
Some registered persons have trouble making ends meet, even with a full-time job as a stockbroker. Other folks just want more -- and they seek outside... Read On
July 16, 2014
This stockbroker wasn't named in the public customer's FINRA Arbitration Statement of Claim caption.  The brokerage firm settled for less than 3%... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab Commission CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Department of Justice Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker RIA Prison Disclosure NASAA Aguilar FCPA Subway Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Variable Annuity Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education OIP Tax Liens Willful CE Unregistered Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Impersonator Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks RMBS PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Arrest Barclays Liens Failure To Supervise Apple Time And Price T&P Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Charge Sexist NML Argentina Embezzlement Silver Judgment Bank Fraud Deceased TSSB Trustee Frumento Conspiracy 6th Circuit Proctor Rule 3040 Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Compromise Website TRO Supervision SDNY Piwowar Rule 1122 Article V signature VA Rule 3270 OWB
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+