An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Wells Fargo Embroiled In Another Trainee Fee Dispute
Written: November 12, 2012

A picture taken on February 8, 2011 in Rennes,...

In a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) arbitration Statement of Claim filed in April 2012, Claimant Wells Fargo Advisors sought to recover $25,000 in compensatory damages attendant to the alleged breach of a Supplementary Training Agreement to which Respondent Graham, appearing pro se, was a party. In The Matter of the FINRA Arbitration Between Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, Claimant, vs. Benjamin Graham, Respondent (FINRA Arbitration 12-01438, November 9, 2012).

The sole FINRA arbitrator found Respondent liable and ordered him to pay to Claimant:

  • $25,000.00 plus 3% interest from December 11, 2009 until the award is paid in full; and
  • $2,500 in attorneys fees.

Bill Singer‘s Comment

Once upon a time, when Wall Street was rolling out the hiring carpet, major brokerage firms offered Employee Forgivable Loans to top producers and had trainee programs for wannabes.

In more recent years, as Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Smith Barney, JP Morgan, and UBS fell upon hard times, those enticements faded.  Moreover, those who walked upon Wall Street’s cushy welcome mat and into an entry-level job or highly compensated stockbroker position, often found themselves in a hostile work environment and, if they found themselves forced out or decided to quit, often on the receiving end of hardball collection efforts for the balances of EFLs or trainee fees.  In many of these collection efforts, the former employers acted responsibly and were entitled to recoup their outlays or costs; other times, however, the whole collection effort took on unsavory overtones of victimizing folks who were laid off or forced out through no fault of their own.

By and large, I hate — perhaps I should say “detest” — these Wall Street Training Fee cases.  The theory behind this practice is that a brokerage firm invests its time and money training raw globs of clay into becoming high-powered, professional stockbrokers.  Depending upon the training agreement, the bargain is that the firm bestows the benefits of all that fine training upon you with the understanding that you will remain employed for at least a certain period of time (as set forth in your Training Agreement).

The inherent threat in the training arrangement is that if you leave before the expiration of the term, you must repay the training costs.  How much do you have to repay?  To supposedly make matters simple in the event of litigation, your employer graciously sets a valuation for the repayment of the training in the Training Agreement — and it’s often some whopping figure like $75,000.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I sort of understand why this punitive practice exists.  Brokerage firms figure that any number of their competitors would just love it if someone else would pick up the training costs for all the newbies.  Sure — let someone else triage through the numbskulls and weed them out, let someone else teach the basics of what’s a stock and what’s a bond, and let someone else incur the risk if the kid washes out after a few months of cold calling.  At the end of all of that, if I can snap up a freshly trained youngster and put him or her in production, gee, I save a lot of bucks and time.

Like I said, conceptually, I get the rationale.  On the other hand, as I said earlier, I hate and detest the practice of enforcing trainee fees.  I mean, where does this nonsense stop?  If you take a minimum wage job at McDonald’s and they train you in how to flip burgers and toast buns, should that employer be able to ding you for all that training if you quit and go to Burger King or Wendy’s?  Yeah, I know, stocks ain’t burgers. It’s different. Sure, it’s always different — except, when you think about it, it’s really not.

For one thing, I’ve rarely, if ever, seen any trainee get the value of what their former firm now claims was the fair price-tag for the training.  Sure, a Wall Street employer can put in an agreement that a trainee who leaves early has to repay $25,000 or $75,000 or whatever.  On the other hand, once you start drilling down into the actual costs of providing stockbroker training and you start to examine what’s actually taught, it’s  hard to reconcile the demanded dollar amount of the sought repayment with the value of the training.

Last I heard, annual tuition for Harvard was about $50,000, which is not to say that a year at Harvard is worth $50,000, but it is a reference point for the absurd demands that are involved with these Wall Street training fee arbitrations. Ultimately, much of what passes for securities-industry training could be found in a Securities for Idiots book, which doesn’t cost anywhere near five-figures.

The cost of training your salesforce as a risk that an employer should shoulder; and not one that should be pushed off on some kid who thinks that she might want to become a stockbroker, only to learn that it’s not the right career.  Moreover, training folks to learn how to make dozens of daily cold calls, how to overcome customers’ objections, and how to push house product too often finds its way into the curriculum.

Wall Street as an industry should underwrite the cost of educating its registered persons. Forcing a broker to stay on with an employer for another year or so in order to avoid having to repay training costs is not best for the industry or the investing public.  I sure as hell don’t want a disgruntled, unhappy stockbroker servicing my needs — and the ramifications to the employing brokerage firm for forcing such a person to remain employed may be quite negative in the event of a customer lawsuit.

Similarly, if the ultimate concern here is to not bestow a benefit upon a competitor, then why not create something akin to the present Broker Protocol and require new employer firms to reimburse the former employer for the remaining pro rata training costs?

Then there’s that incredibly novel idea: how about treating your registered persons with respect and dignity, and providing a nurturing workplace?  You know, instead of beating them over the head because they want to leave what they view as a sweatshop, how about you go out of your way to make the environment so professional that they’d want to stay?

The Wells Fargo Fight Cards

Wells Fargo seems to have a penchant for taking trainee fee cases to the mat  –  although some of these reported FINRA arbitrations may have been inherited through Wells Fargo’s 2008 acquisition of the old Wachovia brokerage business, which included A.G. Edwards. Of the eight contested FINRA trainee fee arbitrations that resulted in decisions that I’ve recently written about, all involved either Wells Fargo, Wachovia, or A.G. Edwards.  The reported FINRA arbitration decision in those eight cases have not reflected an overwhelming record of victory for the former employer.

In two FINRA arbitrations that “Street Sweeper” reported about, Wells Fargo got every penny it sought in its damages demand and that was against a former employee who represented himself and a second similar pro se case as reported in this column. In one case and in another matter, the firm received less than half of the compensatory damages sought.  In three cases, the former Wells Fargo employee walked away (also read this case) from the battle without having to pay a penny (as was also the case in an A.G. Edwards trainee fee case). In today’s case, the firm got the full $25,000 sought on the agreement plus attorneys’ fees.

For more details, see these “Street Sweeper” columns:

  1. Wells Fargo In Groundhog Day Deja Vu Training Fee Disputes
  2. Wells Fargo Blindsided In Trainee Fee Loss
  3. Wells Fargo Trainee Fee Arbitration Comes Up Short
  4. Wells Fargo KO’d In Trainee Fee Case
  5. Wells Fargo Advisors Wins Trainee Fees Arbitration For $25,000
  6. Arbitrator Awards Less Than 20% Of Trainee Fees to Wells Fargo
  7. A.G. Edwards Loses Training Fee Case to Pro Se Stockbroker

 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
October 31, 2014
On June 3, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announced the second-largest trading suspension in its history as part of its "Operati... Read On
October 31, 2014
For one reason or another, stockbrokers may not want to maintain their personal accounts at their employer's brokerage firm. Some of the reasons often... Read On
October 30, 2014
As with virtually every job, the practice of law often becomes mind-numbingly boring. Every so often, however, the profession presents you with a fasc... Read On
October 29, 2014
When it comes to in-house compliance and industry regulatory matters, a loan is a loan and a gift is a gift -- and the two have very different meaning... Read On
October 28, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#wallstreetjobs @brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS... Read On
October 27, 2014
They got a name for it: padding the old expense account. The way I see it, whenever some misconduct has an acronym or generally accepted term, it mean... Read On
October 25, 2014
Merrill Lynch, Edward Jones, Large Hotel Man, And Double Charges For A Few Glasses Of WineOctober 24, 2014Voices were raised, a waitress was upset, an... Read On
October 24, 2014
Voices were raised, a waitress was upset, and large man with hotel bar intervened. Now if that doesn't pique your interest, I might as well get m... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration Counterclaim BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab Commission CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers SIPC IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Department of Justice Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Thain Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 Eligibility RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Rule 3050 Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity Expense Reimbursement FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker RIA Prison Disclosure NASAA Aguilar FCPA Subway Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank Hospital God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Reuters Retaliation Variable Annuity Arbitraiton Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education OIP Tax Liens Willful CE Unregistered Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Impersonator Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks RMBS AML PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement Money Market employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Arrest Barclays Liens Failure To Supervise Apple Time And Price T&P Willfully Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Debit Card Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Charge Sexist NML Argentina Embezzlement Silver Investor Alert Judgment Bank Fraud Deceased TSSB Mary Jo White Trustee Motion To Dismiss Frumento Conspiracy 6th Circuit Proctor Rule 3040 Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Self Regulation Short Sale Compromise Website TRO Supervision Vacatur SDNY BrokeAndBroker Bill Singer Piwowar Stifel Rule 1122 Article V signature Inside Information VA Regulation SP Customer Rule 3270 Rule 3240 OWB 2Cir Stockbrokers
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+