An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Veteran Wall Street Lawyer Bill Singer Dissects The FINRA AWC
Written: June 28, 2013

Over the years, "BrokeAndBroker" readers have asked me to explain the nuances involved in entering into Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent settlements ("AWC") with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"). While AWC's appear to be the most common outcome for FINRA regulatory investigations, the mechanics and consequences of such a settlement are rarely understood by many registered representatives acting as their own counsel, and often not properly explained by lawyers to their industry clients.  Consequently, let's go directly to the FINRA rule pertaining to AWC's and see what's what (Note my commentary in "SIDE BAR").

FINRA Rule 9216: Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent; Plan Pursuant to SEA Rule 19d-1(c)(2)

(a) Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent Procedures
(1) Notwithstanding Rule 9211, if the Department of Enforcement or the Department of Market Regulation has reason to believe a violation has occurred and the member or associated person does not dispute the violation

SIDE BAR: The launch-pad for entering into the world of the AWC is that FINRA has formed a belief that you engaged in a violation of its rules.  Once FINRA has formed that opinion, you are given a choice:
  • Door #1: If you are prepared to throw in the towel and settle the allegations, you can opt to do so before a formal Complaint is issued and pursue resolution via an AWC, but you will have to agree not to dispute FINRA's allegation of the violation(s). 
  • Door #2: If you are incensed, outraged, and prepared to take the fight all the way down to the mat, then you are likely headed for a contested hearing.  
Keep in mind, however, that once a formal FINRA disciplinary Complaint is issued, you may still settle via an Offer of Settlement, but that is a separate and distinct option from the AWC.

the Department of Enforcement or the Department of Market Regulation may prepare and request that the member or associated person execute a letter accepting a finding of violation, consenting to the imposition of sanctions, and agreeing to waive such member's or associated person's right to a hearing before a Hearing Panel or, if applicable, an Extended Hearing Panel, and any right of appeal to the National Adjudicatory Council, the SEC, and the courts, or to otherwise challenge the validity of the letter, if the letter is accepted. 

SIDE BARAt the start of the AWC process, you will execute a letter -- and that act  may become a bone of contention long after your AWC is approved because many respondents will claim that FINRA drafted the settlement, twisted their arms, gave them no choice -- and that the settling respondent was basically forced to sign off on it.  In fact, to some degree, FINRA has anticipated that position and makes you execute the AWC letter (even though you will be given what effectively amounts to a non-negotiable format with which to work).

Okay, so now you finally have cracked the code as to the source of the terms "Acceptance" and "Waiver" and "Consent."  In your letter, you will:
  • ACCEPT FINRA's finding of violation; 
  • CONSENT to the sanctions imposed upon you; 
  • WAIVE your right to a hearing. 
Why didn't they call it a Acceptance, Consent, and Waiver, an ACW?  I dunno and they didn't ask my opinion.

Sure -- you may still harbor some disagreement with FINRA about the underlying facts, but once you submit the AWC, you are agreeing that whatever the self-regulator found as a violation of its rules is an accepted finding -- and you don't get to cross your fingers on that. Similarly, you don't get a mulligan after you have consented to the fines and/or suspension and/or other sanctions imposed upon you. Once your signature is dry on an accepted AWC, you don't have the right to a hearing on the matter. Finally, if you have second thoughts after the AWC is accepted, you also waived your right to appeal to FINRA's NAC, to the Securities Exchange Commission, and to the courts.  Game. Set. Match

The letter shall describe the act or practice engaged in or omitted, the rule, regulation, or statutory provision violated, and the sanction or sanctions to be imposed. Unless the letter states otherwise, the effective date of any sanction(s) imposed will be a date to be determined by FINRA staff.

SIDE BAR: In negotiating an AWC, there are no fixed and fast rules as to when a specific fine must be paid or a suspension served.  You may have some limited ability when negotiating the AWC to ask the FINRA staff to agree to an earlier or later date for particular sanctions.  Some folks prefer to get things moving immediately; others need time to get their affairs in order -- and some just want to serve the 30-day suspension in August or during a holiday season.

(2)(A) If a member or person associated with a member submits an executed letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent, by the submission such member or person associated with a member also waives:
(i) any right of such member or person associated with a member to claim bias or prejudgment of the General Counsel, the National Adjudicatory Council, or any member of the National Adjudicatory Council, in connection with such person's or body's participation in discussions regarding the terms and conditions of the letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent, or other consideration of the letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent, including acceptance or rejection of such letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent; and
(ii) any right of such member or person associated with a member to claim that a person violated the ex parte prohibitions of Rule 9143 or the separation of functions prohibitions of Rule 9144, in connection with such person's or body's participation in discussions regarding the terms and conditions of the letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent, or other consideration of the letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent, including acceptance or rejection of such letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent.

SIDE BAR: If your AWC is accepted, you waive your right to claim bias or prejudgment by FINRA's General Counsel, the NAC, and any NAC member concerning the discussions involving the terms and conditions of your AWC. Similarly, you know how you really, really believe that during the negotiations about the AWC's terms and conditions, the Staff had some improper private chat about you with someone on the NAC or that the separation you were promised between the Staff and the NAC was winked at? Well, kiss that claim goodbye if the AWC is accepted because you will have waived your right to claim those improper acts.
  
(B) If a letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent is rejected, the member or associated person shall be bound by the waivers made under paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)(A) for conduct by persons or bodies occurring during the period beginning on the date the letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent was executed and submitted and ending upon the rejection of the letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent.

SIDE BAR: In essence, FINRA has taken out an insurance policy during the period that you executed the AWC and until it was rejected. During that period, you are bound by all the waivers you made in the submitted but now rejected AWC. Something of a heads I win and tails you lose proposition. On the other hand, this is how it goes with virtually all such settlements and it is something of the grease that allows the process to spin its wheels.

(3) If the member or associated person executes the letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent, it shall be submitted to the National Adjudicatory Council. The Review Subcommittee or the Office of Disciplinary Affairs may accept such letter or refer it to the National Adjudicatory Council for acceptance or rejection by the National Adjudicatory Council. The Review Subcommittee may reject such letter or refer it to the National Adjudicatory Council for acceptance or rejection by the National Adjudicatory Council. 

(4) If the letter is accepted by the National Adjudicatory Council, the Review Subcommittee, or the Office of Disciplinary Affairs, it shall be deemed final and shall constitute the complaint, answer, and decision in the matter. If the letter is rejected by the Review Subcommittee or the National Adjudicatory Council, FINRA may take any other appropriate disciplinary action with respect to the alleged violation or violations. If the letter is rejected, the member or associated person shall not be prejudiced by the execution of the letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent under paragraph (a)(1) and the letter may not be introduced into evidence in connection with the determination of the issues set forth in any complaint or in any other proceeding. . .

SIDE BAR: Ya gotta love the bureaucracy that is now FINRA.  They got a Review Subcommittee, the NAC, and the Office of Disciplinary Affairs all involved in possibly accepting a given AWC.  
A Journey Of A Thousand MilesAccording to the rule, you must submit the AWC to the NAC. You got that? The first step in the AWC journey is to submit your AWC to the NAC. 
The Power To Accept: Next, the AWC apparently winds up before a Review Subcommittee or the Office of Disciplinary Affairs ("ODA"). The Review Subcommittee or the ODA can accept an AWC.
The Power to Reject: The Review Subcommittee can reject an AWC but the ODA lacks such power. 
Unrejected But Not Accepted: Both the Review Subcommittee and the ODA may "refer" an unrejected AWC that they don't accept to the NAC for further consideration but only the Review Subommittee may "reject" an AWC.  An unrejected AWC that they don't accept -- you really can't make up such gobbledygook like that without being a wordsmith with great talent.
The Plenary Power of the NAC: The NAC can accept or reject whatever the hell it wants.
  
If the above process makes sense to you, give yourself a gold star -- in fact, take two!

Three For The Price Of One: If the Review Subcommittee, the ODA, or the NAC accepts your AWC, that document magically is transformed into a trinity of a FINRA Complaint, your Answer, and FINRA's Decision

Tabula Rasa: If the Review Subcommittee or the NAC rejects your AWC, the good news is that the slate is wiped clean by FINRA and the self regulator promises not to use your proposed AWC as evidence in connection with a determination concerning the issues set forth in any Complaint or in a proceeding.  Ummm . . . one word of caution from an old hand at dealing with FINRA.  Be careful about what you disclose during the AWC negotiations. Yeah, all well and fine that FINRA promises not to introduce any of your damaging admissions into evidence or to incorporate them into the Complaint. By the way, have you ever tried to un-ring a bell? 

So, at long last you have decided, for whatever reason, to go along with the whole AWC thing and FINRA gets back to you with the semi-good news that it's now a done deal.  Trust me, the pain ain't done yet.  If you look at a typical AWC, you will likely find this language:

C. If accepted:
1. this AWC will become part of their permanent disciplinary records and may be considered in any future actions brought by FINRA or any other regulator against them;

SIDE BAR: You know all those water cooler lawyers in your branch office who told you to go with the AWC because it's no big deal and it's simply a settlement and no settlement can ever be used against you? Well, next time you see that idiot dispensing his nonsense, maybe you should dump the water jug on his head.  The AWC goes into your Central Registration Depository record and in the future, should you slip up, rest assured that your past AWC "history" will be cited to show that you lack remorse, are a recidivist, should be slammed with the most extreme fines, and are the kind of registered person who should be barred.

2. this AWC will be made available through FINRA's public disclosure program in response to public inquiries about their disciplinary records;
3. FINRA may make a public announcement concerning this agreement and the subject matter thereof in accordance with FINRA Rule 8313; and

SIDE BAR: I beg you -- I plead with you -- read and re-read paragraphs #2 and #3.  Your AWC will find its way onto FINRA's database, including BrokerCheck. Your AWC may well find its way into a press release, which could then be picked up by the media -- including blogs such as BrokeAndBroker.  An AWC is NOT a confidential, private affair between you and FINRA. Once the AWC is approved, there is a fairly good chance that you have lost the ability to contain the matter and it may well find its way into the public domain.  

4. Respondents may not take any action or make or permit to be made any public statement, including in regulatory filings or otherwise, denying, directly or indirectly, any finding in this AWC or create the impression that the AWC is without factual basis. Respondents may not take any position in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of FINRA, or to which FINRA is a party, that is inconsistent with any part of this AWC. Nothing in this provision affects their: (i) testimonial obligations; or (ii) right to take legal or factual positions in litigation or other legal proceedings in which FINRA is not a party.

SIDE BAR: You've seen it. I've seen it. Those idiots who post on social media and comment on published articles and explain that they only settled the AWC because FINRA forced them, that FINRA had no basis whatsoever to charge them, that the whole settlement was a sham, and that they simply agreed to settle in order to avoid paying a lawyer.  After you have read #4 above, you tell me -- is that a smart thing to do?

D. Respondents may attach a Corrective Action Statement to this AWC that is a statement of demonstrable corrective steps taken to prevent future misconduct. Respondents understand that they may not deny the charges or make any statement that is inconsistent with the AWC in this Statement. This Statement does not constitute factual or legal findings by FINRA, nor does it reflect the views of FINRA or its staff.

SIDE BAR: Every so often I see a Corrective Action Statement. Generally, I don't like them, don't see the point in authoring them, and would typically counsel against such recourse. Some clients find it cathartic. Some think it may give them an edge in the future -- that they sort of get to put a bit of a spin on the story.  FINRA is not going to let you append some statement that denies the charges or offers a cutesy explanation of an alleged fact.  In the end, I would suggest that if you have any unresolved issues with FINRA that you go to the gym, hit the heavy bag, and maybe spend an hour on the treadmill.


SIDE BAR With Bill Singer (Thomson Reuters)
Is Self Regulation A Dinosaur on Wall Street? (8:51 run time) 

Martin Kaplan, Esq. explains the significance of his landmark victory in Fiero v. FINRA. Kaplan and Bill Singer, Esq. discuss whether FINRA is now a toothless tiger. 

READ: "FINRA Loses Landmark Federal Appeals Case on Collection of Fines" (BrokeAndBroker.com, October 7, 2011)

NEW EPISODE OF 
SIDE BAR WITH BILL SINGER 
NOW ONLINE
Martin Kaplan, Esq. Talks About FINRA

REUTERS.COM


YouTube for iPhone/Pad Users



Topics: AWC  FINRA  Bill SInger  BrokeAndBroker  
 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
April 24, 2014
Few financial products have proven as controversial as Real Estate Investment Trusts, and few REITS have grabbed their share of negative headlines as ... Read On
April 24, 2014
Virtual currency, electronic money, cryptocurrency: Whatever the name, it's in the news but not necessarily in a good way. When I start getting an inc... Read On
April 23, 2014
Wall Street may be the place where trillions of dollars exchange hands, but it's not the place where a registered person should simply ask a customer ... Read On
April 22, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#brokeandbroker #billsinger #wallstreetjobs&n... Read On
April 21, 2014
I fully appreciate that FINRA has a legitimate concern about industry personnel impersonating customers. I also understand why it is appropriate in th... Read On
April 19, 2014
Will This Tax Season Lien On You?April 18, 2014We just made it through another tax season. The good news is that you filed and are fully paid up -- or... Read On
April 18, 2014
We just made it through another tax season. The good news is that you filed and are fully paid up -- or, the bad news is that you didn't file or you h... Read On
April 17, 2014
In this digital age there are still folks who physically cut-and-paste. How quaint. Of course, quaint or not, when you start using the terms "cut-and-... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker Prison NASAA Aguilar FCPA Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Variable Annuity Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses OIP ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Barclays Willful Apple Time And Price T&P Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Sexist Argentina Judgment Bank Fraud TSSB Trustee Frumento 6th Circuit Proctor Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Compromise Website Supervision Piwowar Tax Liens signature VA
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+