An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

LOST: One Securities and Exchange Commission Regulatory Priority
Written: May 18, 2010

Oh, puhleaaaaase, somebody, anybody, help! 

The Securities and Exchange Commission has announced yet another public meeting of yet another advisory committee.  One more laughable event in an endless stream of idiocy.  Apparently, the new theory of Wall Street regulation is that if you can't do anything to prevent securities fraud, maybe you can talk it to death.

Count 'em: Four SEC commissioners and one SEC Chair. These five professionals were presidentially appointed because they supposedly brought something to the job -- background, experience, insight. Despite those credentials, these SEC leaders have no opinions and no workable ideas.  Why do I say that?  Well, SEC Press Release after SEC Press Release after SEC Press Release reference an inexhaustible supply of panels, roundtables, committees, subcommittees, and subgroups, which, we are told, are necessary to advise, guide, and educate those in charge of the federal regulator. Which sort of raises the question: Why were they appointed in the first place if they are as clueless as the press releases imply?

On May 13, 2010, the SEC issued the following Press Release, which I present to you verbatim (except for the detailed Meeting Agenda, which you can read for yourself at

SEC Investor Advisory Committee Announces Meeting Agenda, List of Participants


Washington, D.C., May 13, 2010 — The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Advisory Committee today announced the agenda for its public meeting to be held on May 17, 2010. The Committee was formed by the SEC in 2009 to advise the Commission as to its regulatory priorities.

Dan Ariely, an expert on behavioral economics and author of Predictably Irrational, will discuss his work with regard to factors that influence investor decision-making. The Committee will also hear from a panel of experts on the topic of mandatory arbitration provisions in customer agreements with brokers. The panel will consist of Linda Fienberg of FINRA, Patricia Cowart of Wells Fargo Corp., Jennifer Johnson of Lewis & Clark Law School, and Barbara Black of the University of Cincinnati College of Law. Other issues to be discussed include the fiduciary responsibility of investment professionals (including advisers and brokers), money market fund “net asset value” calculation, and the potential use of public service announcements to provide investor information. The Committee’s subcommittees will also report on the status of their activity, including analysis of potential disclosure regarding environmental, social and governance issues.

The meeting at the SEC headquarters building at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., will be open to the public with seating on a first-come, first-served basis. The meeting also will be webcast on the SEC’s website.

For additional information about the meeting, contact the SEC’s Office of Public Affairs at (202) 551-4120.

Lemme see if I got this.  In 2009, over a year ago, they formed an SEC Investor Advisory Committee "to advise the Commission as to its regulatory priorities." Is this truly a puzzle?  Am I to honestly believe that the SEC's Chair and four commissioners have no idea as to what their regulatory priorities are?

How about I give you folks a clue:  Your regulatory priority is to protect the public

Sadly, a year later,  it doesn't appear that the SEC Investor Advisory Comittee has accomplished much. After all, the SEC continues to hold public hearings in 2010 in order to figure out what its regulatory priorities should be.  Of course, let's be blunt if not a tad indelicate here: This mammoth struggle is little more than seeking a useless answer for a nebulous academic question. These are just not the days for philosophizing about regulatory priorities.

At the Investor Advisory Committee's public meeting about what the SEC's regulatory priorities should be, Mr.  Dan Ariely is slated to discuss "factors that influence investor decision-making."  Mr. Ariely is an expert on behavioral economics.  Okay, not exactly sure what that is but it sounds impressive. Moreover, Mr. Ariely is the author of a tome titled Predictably Irrational.  What I'm not getting is why does the SEC need to schedule a public meeting for Mr. Ariely to inform the SEC of his opinions and positions?  Isn't that all in his book?  Wouldn't it have been a hell of a lot more efficient to simply have sent the SEC Chair and commissioners a copy of his book in 2009?  

I also note from the Press Release that bureaucratic mitosis has already divided the vaunted Investment Advisory Committee into multiple Subcommittees, each of which is slated to report on the status of its own activities.  I'm sure it will be standing room only when the subcommittee folks analyze "potential disclosure regarding environmental, social and governance issues."

It's bad enough that the SEC chartered this Investor Advisory Committee over a year ago, it's bad enough that this committee has already split into multiple subcommittees, and it's bad enough that they are holding public meetings to propagate this silliness.  What's more troubling is that SEC staff and executives will likely waste time sitting in on the public meeting -- as if there aren't more pressing matters demanding their attention (and, no, I am not talking about the annual online pornography awards show). At some point, isn't enough, enough? Does the SEC have endless hours and staff to waste with such nonsense?

Are you folks at the SEC aware that on February 6, 2009, SEC Chair Mary Schapiro delivered a Speech  at the Practising Law Institute's "SEC Speaks in 2009" Program  and said the following:

[I]n addition to our enforcement priorities, the Commission will of course also have a full plate when it comes to our policy and rulemaking agenda.

In deciding upon regulatory priorities, it is vital that the SEC re-engage with the people we serve: investors. The investor community — from the largest pension fund to the family who has saved in their 401(k) or 529 plan — needs to feel that they have someone on their side — that they can go to the SEC to seek redress, or to have their opinions heard.

To that end, we will form an Investor Advisory Committee to ensure that the Commission hears first hand about the issues most concerning to investors.

Fifteen months ago, Chair Schapiro said that the SEC had a full plate for its agenda -- but it doesn't look like anyone has yet to touch their food. She said that it was "vital" for the SEC to re-engage with public investors and that we need to feel that someone is on our side. She promised to fling open the doors at the SEC so that we could seek redress and have our opinions heard. Sadly, over a year later, the SEC is floundering about in search of its mission.

Fine words and blustery committee meetings only go so far. Doesn't Chair Schapiro think that a great way for the investor community to feel that they have someone on their side is for the SEC to actually do something beyond creating committees and holding public meetings?  If Chair Schapiro is truly concerned about hearing our opinions, then set up an interactive website or forum -- boy, will you get all the opinions that you want.  Then there is the misplaced perception that we want the SEC to hear us. The problem isn't whether the SEC is hearing us.  The problem is that the SEC (and most bureaucracies) never seems to be listening to us.

Years ago, before the Great Recession, before Wall Street shook and crumbled around us, that was the time for all this leisurely chatting. That was when the SEC needed to have created a Plan A, a Plan B, and and Plan C.  Instead, they created Roundtable A, Committee B, and Subcommittee C. No, I'm sorry, but enough with these damn SEC public meetings and fanciful panels. Fix the mess.  Do something. Talk is cheap -- and yours seems to be endless.

For some additional context, please read


Previous Entries
April 16, 2014
Here's an interesting cocktail of facts: an IRA, a mother, powers of attorney, and a stockbroker son. Add into that mix questions about whether a $60,... Read On
April 15, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsFor a full listing of current job openings, visit the BrokeAndBroker Employment Page ... Read On
April 14, 2014
Auction Rate Securities are the unwanted gift that keeps on giving. In today's Blog, we report about yet another bit of collateral ... Read On
April 12, 2014
Citicorp Loses Bizarre Motion To Compel Class Action ArbitrationApril 11, 2014As part of the terms of his employment, former Citicorp Credit Services,... Read On
April 11, 2014
As part of the terms of his employment, former Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. employee Keith Russell had agreed to arbitrate “all employment-related d... Read On
April 10, 2014
Citigroup goes after another former employer to recover a balance on a promissory note. Nothing new here. In this case, the former registered person f... Read On
April 9, 2014
Alas, all good things come to an end and, sadly, E*TRADE (or is that E*Trade or is that Etrade or how the hell are you supposed to write that anyway?)... Read On Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Morgan Keegan Arbitration Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker Prison NASAA Aguilar FCPA Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Variable Annuity Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses OIP ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Barclays Willful Apple Time And Price T&P Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Argentina Judgment Bank Fraud TSSB Trustee Frumento 6th Circuit Proctor Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Compromise Website Supervision Piwowar signature VA
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+