An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

UBS Loses Lehman Structured Notes Arbitration.
Written: December 5, 2010

More than two years after Lehman Brothers imploded and filed for bankruptcy, that firmís legacy seems to be a dubious gift that keeps on giving -- and for some public investors, as well as many Wall Street professionals, that gift continues to be a world of pain.

The Red Ink Looked A Lot Like Blood

Back in 2007, when the financial world was careening off the side of the road and over the cliff, UBS was reported to be considering a merger with the increasingly desperate Lehman. At that time, Lehman purportedly had over $100 billion of its equity tied up in hemorrhaging mortgage and real estate investments,  which likely explained why the cost of Lehman CDSs (credit default swaps) had skyrocketed. In investigating the firm's financial situation as an understandable consideration for the purpose of the merger, UBS likely understood the reality of how bad things truly were -- perhaps even more so than most other market participants.

Perhaps the Definition of Risk?

Notwithstanding UBS's alleged knowledge of Lehmanís precarious financial situation, UBS continued to recommend the purchase to its customers of structured notes issued by Lehman, which were essentially a funding vehicle for Lehman by which that firm was able to secure loans with little, if any, collateral. Moreover, itís not like Lehmanís structured notes were exactly liquid investments in the dark days of 2007 and beyond. Still, for whatever reason, a number of Wall Street firms, including UBS, recommended these structured notes to the public.

Repo 105

Among the now ticklish problems for UBS is that while the firm was recommending the purchase by its clients of Lehman structured notes, UBS was lending money to Lehman pursuant to fully collateralized short-term loans at high rates of interest Ė now known as part of the Repo 105 program.

For a superb explanation of the Repo 105 program, read "Lehman's Repo 105 Counterparties Barclays, Mizuho, UBS, Deutsche Bank, And KBC May Have Attempted To "Squeeze" The Bank" (March 12, 2010) at ZeroHedge.com

So Ė on the one hand UBS is profiting from the commissions/fees it generated via the sales to UBS clients of Lehman notes, and, at the same time, UBS was profiting from fees and interest that were generated by the firmís collateralized loans to Lehman.

By late 2008, the Lehman structured notes were largely illiquid Ė and certainly thatís an understatement by the time of the firmís bankruptcy. As to UBSís Repo 105 program with Lehman, well thankfully for UBS, it was largely able to pull the plug on its exposure before the likelihood of repayment was nil. The net result of all the dealing and alleged self-dealing is that by the time of Lehmanís bankruptcy, UBS clients who were invested in Lehman structured notes were largely stranded; whereas, UBS had jumped ship in terms of its own exposure to Lehman and wound up in a fairly strong net basis.

The Stuff of Lawsuits

UBS argues that it did not engage in unconscionable double-dealing. That argument is now being tested as UBS raises it in the form of its defense to investor claims. What has apparently troubled a number of public customer lawyers and prompted the filing of numerous lawsuits is precisely that seeming conflict.  After all, how could the same brokerage firm recommend investing in structured notes from Lehman (largely uncollateralized or poorly so) when, at the same time, that same brokerage firm is insisting upon fully collateralized loans from Lehman and only providing funds on the basis of relatively high interest rates? 

Case in Point

In a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Arbitration Statement of Claim filed in November 19, 2008, Claimants Steven and Ellen Edelson alleged unsuitability, misrepresentation and omission, wrongful conduct, fraud, negligence, and breach of conduct against Respondent UBS. Claimants invested $529,688.00 in "100% Principal Protection Notes" and "Return Optimization Securities with Partial Protection" issued by Lehman Brothers Holdings and co-underwritten by UBS (hereinafter referred to as the "Lehman Structured Products"). Claimants requested rescission, or in the alternative, compensatory damages in the amount of $529,688.00, plus punitive damages, interest, attorney's fees, and costs of the proceeding. In Matter of the FINRA Arbitration Between Steven Edelson and Ellen Edelson, Claimants vs. UBS Financial Services, Inc.,Respondent (FINRA Arbitration Case 08-04357, December 2, 2010).

Respondent UBS denied the allegations made in the Statement of Claim and asserted various affirmative defenses.

This FINRA arbitration proceeded under the FINRA Public Arbitrator Pilot Program, which allows parties to choose whether to have a non-public arbitrator on the panel. On November 3, 2010, the FINRA Arbitration Award was served without indication that this case having proceeded under the Public Arbitrator Pilot Program. Therefore, the award was recently amended to reflect that the case proceeded under the Public Arbitrator Pilot Program.

The FINRA Panel found Respondent UBS liable for and ordered it to pay to Claimants compensatory damages in the amount of $529,688.00. Claimants were ordered to assign any remaining right, title, and interest in the Lehman Structured Products to Respondent.

==================================================

clear pixel A Not-So Opulent Hedge Fund Goes Belly Up

http://blogs.forbes.com/billsinger/2010/12/06/godbole-hedge-fund/

This is a story that may seem a bit complicated but, in reality, itís a fairly basic tale. Stripped of all its Wall Street jargon, we are once again confronted with the all-too-familiar tragedy in which a misguided soul made a mistake and tried to undo the damage ó only to find that the problem went from bad to worse.

For starters, we have Opulent Lite, LP, a California limited partnership that was a hedge fund with approximately 70 investors and assets under management of approximately $30 million. Next, we have Trueblue Strategies, LLC, an investment adviser that provided advised Opulent Lite,  Now, enter, Neil Godbole, age 29, who was the sole principal and owner of Trueblue Strategies, and  beginning in 2005, was wholly responsible for managing Opulent Lite, including its trading decisions, recordkeeping and communications with investors

Apparently starting sometime around 2005, Godboleís trading strategy was to invest most of Opulent Liteís funds in short-term treasury bonds that would mature at the end of the fundís monthly trading period. The remainder of the cash was invested in S&P index options that would expire at the end of the monthly trading period.

So far, so good ó and then, so far, so bad.  READ the entire article at:

http://blogs.forbes.com/billsinger/2010/12/06/godbole-hedge-fund/


 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
April 19, 2014
Will This Tax Season Lien On You?April 18, 2014We just made it through another tax season. The good news is that you filed and are fully paid up -- or... Read On
April 18, 2014
We just made it through another tax season. The good news is that you filed and are fully paid up -- or, the bad news is that you didn't file or you h... Read On
April 17, 2014
In this digital age there are still folks who physically cut-and-paste. How quaint. Of course, quaint or not, when you start using the terms "cut-and-... Read On
April 16, 2014
Here's an interesting cocktail of facts: an IRA, a mother, powers of attorney, and a stockbroker son. Add into that mix questions about whether a $60,... Read On
April 15, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsFor a full listing of current job openings, visit the BrokeAndBroker Employment Page ... Read On
April 14, 2014
Auction Rate Securities are the unwanted gift that keeps on giving. In today's BrokeAndBroker.com Blog, we report about yet another bit of collateral ... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker Prison NASAA Aguilar FCPA Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Variable Annuity Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses OIP ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Barclays Willful Apple Time And Price T&P Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Argentina Judgment Bank Fraud TSSB Trustee Frumento 6th Circuit Proctor Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Compromise Website Supervision Piwowar Tax Liens signature VA
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+