An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Thar Be Monsters -- FINRA Raiding Case Ends With Odd Ruling
Written: January 26, 2011

Things are tough on Wall Street these days, even with a recovering economy. Stockbrokers lost a lot of customers during the Great Recession and they’re not all coming back – many investors have decided that they can just as easily lose their own money and have decided to trade online.  On top of that, many stockbrokers simply gave up and left the industry for other occupations.

Consequently, there’s a volatile mixture in the biz of fewer customers, fewer veteran brokers, and not a whole lot of eager-beaver young bloods looking to begin a not-so fabulous career of endless cold calling.  That places a premium on the old-hands with a book of actively traded accounts or impressive assets under management.

The trouble with premiums is that they quickly become bounties.  Given the cost of planting, watering, and growing a stockbroker, it’s often cheaper just to pay an experienced producer with a book of business to join your firm. Sure, it’s gonna cost you – an up-front bonus, higher pay-out, a bunch of perks – but there are only so many customers and so few brokers and, hey, this is big business and no one has the time to sit around and play games.  Ante up or give someone else your seat.

Pirates of Wall Street

All of which leads us to what in Wall Street jargon is called a “raid,”  the equivalent of a pirate ship boarding a merchant vessel and taking away the cargo, the damsels, and sailors.  On Wall Street, the cargo is the top producers, the best sales assistants, and a smattering of savvy back-office types. Sometimes the buccaneers strip a branch office down to the walls; other times, they just cherry-pick the best and brightest.  These days, it seems that most of Wall StreView Detailset's brokerage firms are flying the Jolly Roger, which sort of makes it hard to tell the good guys from the bad guys, assuming that there are any good guys still afloat on the high seas.

Given that Wall Street is often about cut-throat and backstabbing competition, it's ironic when brokerage firms complain that a competitor or former employee has "stolen" their employees.  For an industry that worships at the altar of supply-and-demand, it would seem that attracting and retaining staff is simply a function of market forces.  Not all that different from the free agent market in professional sports.  Ya win some. Ya lose some.

The tension in the system is between the rights of all employees to work where they deem best and the rights of employers to be protected against unfair competition (particularly when such unfair conduct involves tortious interference with confidential information, trade secrets, or customers).  Traditionally, the first line of defense against unwanted boarding has been to require written employment agreements that contain non-compete and/or non-solicitation provisions.  However, not all industry employees are subject to such agreements.

In recent years (and cyclically with Wall Street's ebbs and flows of fortune), brokerage firms have failed, have merged into other firms, have laid off thousands of employees, and generally forced their crews to walk the plank when financial conditions dictated.  As such, the sanctity of employee "loyalty" to a Wall Street employer has taken quite a beating during the Great Recession. There are only so many shipmates that the Captain can bury after they've dug the secret hiding place for his treasure chest.  At some point, word gets around the decks.  Accordingly, it doesn't take too many shots across the bow these days to motivate large numbers of traders, brokers, and support staff to jump ship.  A rumor here.  A whisper there. A bonus to tip the scales. Yo, ho, ho and a bottle of rum.

Ahoy Matey!

In a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Arbitration Statement of Claim filed in December 2008 and seeking at least $250,000 in damages, Claimant Fox & Company alleged that Respondent Shryack and Respondent Gundy conspired to raid and/or take the entire representative force of Claimant Fox & Co.'s Dallas branch office to Respondent Milkie/Ferguson Investments. As a result of such allegedly dastardly conduct, Claimant sought to recover its lost revenue, which it deemed to be substantial.  

In furtherance of its arbitration claims, Claimant Fox & Co. asserted causes of action including breach of contract; interference with contracts, and raiding. Respondents generally denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Fox & Company Investments, Inc., Claimants, vs. Milkie/Ferguson Investments, Inc., John Edward Shryack, and Steven Alan Gundy, Respondents (FINRA Arbitration 08-05026, January 20, 2011).

Walking the Plank

The FINRA Arbitration Decision in Fox & Company v. Milkie/Ferguson et al. is an odd one.  If it was to be noted on an old nautical map, the description would read: Thar be monsters. 

On the one hand, the FINRA Arbitration Panel found for Claimant Fox & Co. The Panel found Respondents Shryack and Gundy jointly/severally liable and ordered them to pay Claimant Fox $60,000 in compensatory damages plus $10,000 in attorneys’ fees.

That $70,000 is quite a treasure chest; but, hold on, Claimant Fox should not have divided that haul among the crew.  There were three Respondents named by Claimant, but the FINRA Arbitration Panel only granted victory against two of them.

On the other hand, the FINRA Arbitration Panel dismissed Claimant Fox's claims against Respondent Milkie/Ferguson Investments, Inc.. Worse, the Panel found that Claimant filed a frivolous claim against Respondent Milkie/Ferguson and Claimant was ordered to pay to that Respondent $10,000 in attorneys’ fees. 

Arrrrrrrrr, give Captain Milkie/Ferguson ten thousand for his trouble and lower him over the side with a provisioned boat and safe passage. Arrrrrrrrr.  Now, how are we goin' to divide $60,000 among the seven of us? That's 60 divided by 7, that's, what, 8 and then you carry 4 and then you divide that by . . . Arrrrrrrrr, you there, grab a shovel and come with me -- we have a treasure chest to bury.

For additional discussions about recent Wall Street raiding cases:


 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
April 23, 2014
Wall Street may be the place where trillions of dollars exchange hands, but it's not the place where a registered person should simply ask a customer ... Read On
April 22, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#brokeandbroker #billsinger #wallstreetjobs&n... Read On
April 21, 2014
I fully appreciate that FINRA has a legitimate concern about industry personnel impersonating customers. I also understand why it is appropriate in th... Read On
April 19, 2014
Will This Tax Season Lien On You?April 18, 2014We just made it through another tax season. The good news is that you filed and are fully paid up -- or... Read On
April 18, 2014
We just made it through another tax season. The good news is that you filed and are fully paid up -- or, the bad news is that you didn't file or you h... Read On
April 17, 2014
In this digital age there are still folks who physically cut-and-paste. How quaint. Of course, quaint or not, when you start using the terms "cut-and-... Read On
April 16, 2014
Here's an interesting cocktail of facts: an IRA, a mother, powers of attorney, and a stockbroker son. Add into that mix questions about whether a $60,... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker Prison NASAA Aguilar FCPA Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Variable Annuity Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses OIP ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Barclays Willful Apple Time And Price T&P Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Sexist Argentina Judgment Bank Fraud TSSB Trustee Frumento 6th Circuit Proctor Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Compromise Website Supervision Piwowar Tax Liens signature VA
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+