Things just didn't end well between registered rep Dowley and his former employer UBS. There was that ticklish issue about repayment of an employee forgivable loan ("EFL") and the whole dispute over whether UBS had permanently closed its Aspen, Colorado office where Dowley worked.
Why was the open or shut nature of the Aspen office so critical? Well, consider this provision in Dowley's EFL agreement that excused repayment if:
the office in which the Employee is working [was] permanently closed by [UBS], and the next closest [UBS] office is more than 25 miles from the office closed, and the Employee chooses not to relocate to such next closest or to any other [UBS] office.
A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Arbitration Panel wrestled admirably with this case. The evidence seemed evenly distributed between both sides -- and the scales tipped precariously if merely breathed upon.
READ BILL SINGER'S ANALYSIS OF THIS CASE AT
A Stroll Down Wall Street's Fetid Memory Lane of Disparate Regulation(BrokeAndBroker.com Blog)http://www.brokeandbroker.com/5523/jpm-occ-finra-sec/Who... Read On
On November 24, 2020, the Office of Currency Control ("OCC") imposed a $250 million civil monetary penalty against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Although ... Read On
[In]Securities a Guest Blog byAegis J. Frumento, Partner, Stern Tannenbaum & BellMissing a Crowded TableThe old joke goes that you bang yo... Read On
Sometimes, the regulation of Wall Street takes on the appearance of a car crash on the highway -- we should just drive by and avert our eyes, but, for... Read On
With the recent announced departure of SEC Chair Jay Clayton and the likely inauguration of Joe Biden as President, Wall Street will face uncertainty ... Read On