An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
 
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Senator Levin Slams Department of Justice's Inaction Against Goldman Sachs
Written: August 10, 2012

Subcommittee Chairman Carl Levin ,D-MI, questi...

Subcommittee Chairman Carl Levin ,D-MI, questions Daniel Sparks, a former Goldman Sachs partner who ran the mortgage department, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, April 27, 2010, during a Senate Homeland and Secruity and Government Affairs Committee Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. US senators demanded answers on what caused the 2008 global economic meltdown and grilled Goldman Sachs executives on the investment giant's alleged role in the collapse. (Image credit: AFP via @daylife)

There’s simply no polite way to put it: Senator Levin is pissed.

Michigan Senator Carl Levin (D) is a graduate from Harvard Law School and was first elected to the U.S. Senate in 1978, and has continued in office since.  He is Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations; and he serves as the senior Democrat on the  Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. He’s as much of a career politician as there is these days — notwithstanding that he often seems genuinely frustrated with the games that go on in Congress and Wall Street.

On August 10, 2012, Levin issued a statement responding to the announcement by the United States Department of Justice that it was declining to prosecute Goldman Sachs for matters that were nationally televised during the appearance of a number of the firm’s executives before Levin’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.  You all should remember that stuff about Goldman’s alleged conflicts of interest and Abacus and Paulson and subprime mortgages and Fabulous Fab and — well, tell you what, if you don’t recall, then what’s the point in my retelling that sordid tale?

Rather than extract Levin’s relatively short press release, here it is in full text: “Sen. Levin Statement on DOJ Announcement on Goldman Sachs” (August 10, 2012):

WASHINGTON – Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., issued the following statement on the Department of Justice’s announcement regarding Goldman Sachs:

“Our investigation of the origins of the financial crisis revealed wrongdoing and failures among mortgage lenders, banking regulators, credit rating agencies and investment banks. One of those investment banks, Goldman Sachs, created complex securities that included “junk” from its own inventory that it wanted to get rid of. It misled investors by claiming its interests in those securities were “aligned” with theirs while at the same time it was betting heavily against those same securities, and therefore against its own clients, to its own substantial profit. Its actions did immense harm to its clients, and helped create the financial crisis that nearly plunged us into a second Great Depression.

“Those are the facts the subcommittee found. Whether the decision by the Department of Justice is the product of weak laws or weak enforcement, Goldman Sachs’ actions were deceptive and immoral. That’s why I and others fought so hard to include tough new conflict-of-interest provisions in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law, to help ensure that Wall Street could no longer engage in such blatant behavior.

“Yesterday’s announcement makes it even more important that regulators implement Dodd-Frank with rules that do not water down it down, and that they enforce those rules with vigor. The integrity of our financial markets and the strength of our economy demand that we make sure that actions such as Goldman Sachs’ and other recently discovered misdeeds by financial institutions are ended.”

Bill Singer’s Comment

As I contemporaneously noted during the Senate hearings on Goldman Sachs, too many of the Senators questions were inartful, most of the questioners seemed clueless, and the folks answering were evasive.  I opined then and seem vindicated today, that nothing substantive would likely come out of that embarrassment of a public circus.  Those hearings were a waste of time and may well have compromised any subsequent federal criminal prosecution – many of the questions were so poorly compounded as to provide refuge for those answering.  We needed an intense federal investigation; instead, we got political circus.  Like what else is new?

I have long expressed my contempt for Goldman Sachs’ conduct in the underlying matters that gave rise to the Senate’s hearing.  More than two years ago, during the ballyhoo attendant to the then ongoing Securities and Exchange Commission. v. Goldman Sachs, these were my concluding observations in “SEC v. Goldman Sachs: Regime Change or Crowd Control?” (“BrokeAndBroker.com” April 10, 2010)

No Slam Dunk Case

As such, the SEC does not have a slam dunk case.  Further, given Goldman’s deep pockets, one should expect a robust defense.

I still wonder if SEC v. Goldman Sachs is just so much political theater.  In Act I, the SEC and Congress throw the rabble just a small slice of bloody, red meat. In Act II there is a multi-million dollar settlement, a cloud of harmless dust, and, after a few calendar pages are pulled off the pad, things pretty much get back to usual — with some juicy campaign contributions down the road

Forgive an old Wall Street veteran’s cynicism.  After some three decades of sitting through these staged dramas, I’ve become a bit jaded.  Like I said at the beginning, is this about regime change or crowd control?

Guess we got crowd control.  Senator Levin and I seem to agree on at least that much.

So, yeah, sure, the good Senator from Michigan is upset.  He wails about Goldman Sachs having created junk and engaging in “actions [that] did immense harm to its clients, and helped create the financial crisis that nearly plunged us into a second Great Depression.” But, honestly, where was the good Senator and all his saintly colleagues when Goldman Sachs and others were mixing the toxic stew of junk?  And where were all these outraged politicos when it came to slamming the doors in the faces of the lobbyists from Wall Street and refusing to accept a single penny form the folks that they now point the finger of blame at?

Oh, but Senator Levin says that Goldman Sach’s actions was deceptive and immoral – as if, what, that opprobrium cannot be slung at many who sit in the Senate and the House of Representatives?  Given Senator Levin’s legal training at Harvard Law School, he, of all folks, should know that our criminal laws do not necessarily provide for the indictment of all who are merely deceptive and immoral.  If that were the case, many of the Senators colleagues might well be cooling their heels in jail.  And, puhlease, don’t get me started on the issue of deception of one’s family and the immorality of one’s conduct when it comes to Congress’s sordid recent past history of extramarital affairs, inappropriate online posts, and playing footsie in public bathrooms.

As to Senator Levin’s final commentary in his press release, methinks that he foolishly expects that Dodd-Frank will protect us and that our financial markets’ regulators have the capacity to  “enforce those rules with vigor.” Vigor?  I wish the Senator would read my Street Sweeper Blog: ”Judge Rakoff’s Wall Street Zombies Arise In FINRA Citi Settlement: (March 19, 2012), in which, among other commentary, I concluded with these points:

Second Circuit Victory for SEC and Citi

On December 15, 2011, the SEC filed a Notice of Appeal seeking a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that would reverse Judge Rakoff’s rejection of the proposed consent judgment and his order directing the parties to prepare for trial in July 2012. In his public comment on the appeal, SEC Enforcement Direct Robert Khuzami argued that Judge Rakoff was

incorrect in requiring an admission of facts — or a trial — as a condition of approving a proposed consent judgment, particularly where the agency provided the court with information laying out the reasoned basis for its conclusions. . .

On March 15, 2012, Khuzami and his SEC got its wish.  The Second Circuit set aside Judge Rakoff’s rejection of the settlement. As I commented on the SEC’s victory in “The SEC Couldn’t Stop Madoff or Stanford But Jams Up Judge Rakoff Over Citigroup Settlement” (“ Street Sweeper” March 15, 2012):

We now find ourselves in an Alice-In-Wonderland world where the Circuit Court seems to agree that Rakoff should not be required to merely rubber stamp the SEC’s settlement but, on the other hand, the judge should defer to the SEC’s assessment that the settlement is fair.  A fine enough proposition but one that seems made in a vacuum of recent history.

The SEC has run off these cookie-cutter settlements without admission of liability for decades.  It is a bankrupt approach to regulation that partially contributed to the onset of the Great Recession and seems likely to saddle our society with a future filled with more impotent responses. If this regulatory policy is fair and effective, then why has it only left a swath of devastation in its historic path?

Recidivist Zombies Arise!

Clearly this never-ending predilection for the expediency of tepid settlements by Wall Street’s cops shows no signs of ending.  Even as the smoke is still in the air from the SEC’s barrage against Rakoff, we see yet more proof that this bankrupt regulatory policy continues unabated — not only at Wall Street’s federal regulator but even at the industry’s self-regulator FINRA.

Having rebuffed one federal judge’s principled rejection of a settlement, those charged with regulating our financial markets now seem emboldened to permit the big boys to write out large checks for fines, which are ultimately paid by public shareholders, and without one word of meaningful admission of wrongdoing.

Wall Street’s Too-Big-To-Fail sure as hell must find these developments encouraging.  The likes of JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and their ilk can set up a spreadsheet and do the cost-benefits analysis.  Of course, for the small fry, I’m not so sure that all these ardent advocates at the SEC and FINRA will feel the same about their not having to admit wrongdoing.  As to this checkbook diplomacy approach to violations, I doubt that the little guys’ matters reach the deductible.

Failing to contain this counter-productive and discredited regulatory practice at the SEC, we now see that it retains its vibrancy at FINRA.  Rakoff’s zombies have arisen in force. Sadly, both the SEC and FINRA still think that such mealy-mouthed settlements justify self-congratulatory press releases.

After some 34 years of service in the Senate, Carl Levin is angry but, yet, he still thinks that Congress can legislate while subject to the corrosive corruption of lobbying and he still thinks that federal regulators have the political will to truly take on (and take down) the too-big-to-fail.  As if Dodd-Frank will not be eviscerated by influence peddlers.  As if the voices of meaningful Wall Street reform were not long ago drowned out and now silenced.

Last one out of the Senate and DOJ, please, do me a favor, turn off the lights. This dance is over. Those of us who cast the votes long ago gave up on the whole concept of “change.” You guys don’t want it. It’s all a game.  Senator Levin, you think you’re pissed?  How do you think we all feel?


 
[^top^]

Previous Entries
September 13, 2014
BrokeAndBroker Offers A Weekend Musical ExtravaganzaSeptember 12, 2014What's this column about?  Not sure but I thought that I'd just go with it.... Read On
September 12, 2014
What's this column about?  Not sure but I thought that I'd just go with it. It's a Friday afternoon and the Labor Day holiday is behind us and su... Read On
September 12, 2014
Some fights are quick. A quick upper-cut in the first round and, wham, the loser is on the canvass being counted out. Other fights are knock-down-drag... Read On
September 11, 2014
For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), without admitting or de... Read On
September 11, 2014
This is an update of "In Vino No Veritas Says Kurniawan Jury" (BrokeAndBroker.com, December 20, 2013).Before I became a lawyer, I was the third genera... Read On
September 10, 2014
Anti-Money Laundering or AML is a hot button issue for Wall Street's compliance professionals. Given the world of terrorism and organized crime that w... Read On
September 9, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Page BrokeAndBroker.com Jobs#wallstreetjobs @brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS... Read On
September 8, 2014
Notwithstanding the relatively rosier employment picture of recent months (and there are still many thorns hidden in that employment data), the legacy... Read On
BrokeAndBroker.com Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Brokeandbroker.com Morgan Keegan Arbitration Counterclaim BrokeAndBroker.com Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC RRBDLAW.com Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James BrokeandBroker.com Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX BrokerAndBroker.com FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab Commission CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax RRBDlaw.com Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Department of Justice Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity Reimbursement FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker RIA Prison Disclosure NASAA Aguilar FCPA Subway Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Reuters Retaliation Variable Annuity Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education OIP Tax Liens Willful CE Unregistered Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Impersonator Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks RMBS AML PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement Money Market employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Arrest Barclays Liens Failure To Supervise Apple Time And Price T&P Willfully Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Debit Card Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Charge Sexist NML Argentina Embezzlement Silver Judgment Bank Fraud Deceased TSSB Mary Jo White Trustee Frumento Conspiracy 6th Circuit Proctor Rule 3040 Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Short Sale Compromise Website TRO Supervision Vacatur SDNY BrokeAndBroker Bill Singer Piwowar Rule 1122 Article V signature VA Regulation SP Rule 3270 OWB Stockbrokers
 
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+