An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Ignorance Of The Law Defense Fails In Rule 10b-5 Case
Written: April 26, 2013

Bryan Behrens owned and operated 21st Century Financial Group, Inc., a life insurance agency and financial investment advising business; and he subsequently became the sole owner and operator of National Investments, Inc. (“NII”). After promoting NII as a safe and lucrative investment opportunity to his clients, Behrens issued promissory notes offering 7% to 9% fixed returns. Turns out that the investors’ money never quite made its way to its purported destination and Behrens used the funds to prop up his businesses and for his personal use – another Ponzi scheme, at its worst.

Following a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) investigation, in April 2009, a federal grand jury returned a 21-count indictment. Thereafter, Behrens entered into a plea agreement whose terms did not specifically address final sentencing. The pre-sentence investigation report calculated the advisory guidelines imprisonment range as 121-151 months. 

I Know Nuthin'

At his sentencing hearing, Behrens asserted the “No Knowledge” defense and argued he was ineligible for imprisonment because Section 78ff(a) imposes criminal liability for “[w]illful violations” of securities laws or SEC rules or regulations but allows defendants who prove they had “no knowledge” of the rule or regulation they violated to avoid imprisonment,

Round One

The District Court found that the “no knowledge” defense applies only to those convicted of violating SEC rules, rather than securities statutes, and because Behrens had pled guilty to violating the latter (§ 78j(b)), he accordingly could not take advantage of the “no knowledge” provision. The District Court sentenced Behrens to five years’ imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and $6,841,921.90 restitution.

On appeal, the 8th Circuit vacated the district court’s imposition of sixty months’ imprisonment, holding that individuals who are charged with violating both § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5 are still entitled to assert the no knowledge defense. United States v. Behrens, 644 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir. 2011). 

Round Two

On remand,  after finding that Behrens had failed to meet his burden of proving no knowledge and that he “was aware of the verbatim provisions of Rule 10b-5 and that they proscribed illegal conduct,” the District Court imposed the same sentence as in its first decision.

8th Circuit Appeal

Back on appeal to the 8th Circuit, Behrens argued that even if he was aware of the provisions of Rule 10b-5 as they relate to “securities,” his sales involved “promissory notes,” which he did not know constituted securities within the scope of Rule 10b-5. In response to that assertion, the Government urged that the proper statutory interpretation is that Behrens may only avoid prison if he proves by a preponderance of the evidence his ignorance of the existence of Rule 10b-5. USA v. Behrens (8th Circuit, April 25, 2013).


Initially, the 8th Circuit rejected the government’s proposed finding because the Court found that:
“no knowledge” cannot be limited as the Government urges, to no knowledge of the existence of the pertinent SEC rule or regulation.”

Ultimately, the 8fth Circuit determined that:

[T]he better reading of the no-knowledge provision is to allow individuals to avoid a sentence of imprisonment if they can establish that they did not know the substance of the SEC rule or regulation they allegedly violated, regardless of whether they understood its particular application to their conduct. . .

This rule protects from imprisonment individuals who truly are unaware of the substance of an SEC rule or regulation, but it does not go so far as to completely vitiate the principle that ignorance of the law is no defense . . .

Having reduced the task before it to a determination of whether Behrens carried the burden of proof as to his lack of knowledge of “the substance of Rule 10b-5,” the 8th Circuit noted this exchange at the sentencing hearing between the questioning government and the answering Behrens:

Q [Government]. Right. In any event, based on your experience,
you knew that it was illegal to fraudulently take money from investors
in connection with the purchase or sale of a security, didn’t you?
A [Behrens]. Yes.
Q. You knew that it was illegal to make a misrepresentation of a
material fact or an omission of a material fact related to the sale or
purchase of a security, didn’t you?
A. As it relates to a security, yes
Q. You know that it was illegal to engage in a course of conduct
which operates as a fraud or deceit upon a person relating to the
purchase or sale of a security, didn’t you?
A. As it relates to securities, yes.
Q. And you know that—do you know what I’ve just read to you
is Rule 10b-5?
A. As it relates to securities.

The 8th Circuit seems to have found that Behrens’ responses compelled a conclusion that he had sufficient knowledge of the substance of Rule 10b-5 and, as such, the District Court’s sentence of imprisonment was sustained.

SEC v. Behrens et al. (DNE, 8:08-CV-13, January 8, 2010)

SEC v. Behrens (SEC, OIP/Settlement, August 14, 2008)


Previous Entries
May 23, 2015
SEC Commissioner Stein Stands Alone In Her Defense Of The Investing Public And IndustryOne, and only one, Securities and Exchange Commissioner got it ... Read On
May 22, 2015
One, and only one, Securities and Exchange Commissioner got it right. To her ever-lasting credit and to the shame of her colleagues, Commissioner Kara... Read On
May 21, 2015
Yesterday, I tried to predict the future. A few hours before the United States Department of Justice announced its settlement with JPMorgan Chase, Cit... Read On
May 20, 2015
It is now 8:30 a.m. EDT on May 20, 2015 and I am posting this Blog without much enthusiasm – I think the fancy French word for ho... Read On
May 19, 2015
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsEmployment Jobs#wallstreetjobs@brokeandbrokerNOTICE TO EMPLOYERS: BrokeAndBr... Read On
May 18, 2015
The United State Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ("9Cir") affirmed the Central District of California's ("CDCA's") judgment in a clas... Read On
May 18, 2015
There comes a point in a registered representative's career when it may simply be time to move on. For many reps who decide to relocate, the questions... Read On Job Search

Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Morgan Keegan Arbitration Counterclaim Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Criminal Raymond James Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX FBI Banc of America Pro Se PCAOB Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab Commission CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Countrywide Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers SIPC IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Department of Justice Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Thain Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 Eligibility RRBDlaw 8210 Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson Cellphone US Airways JPM BrokeandBroker Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Rule 3050 Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Fifth Amendment Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon CGMI Failure to Supervise Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity Expense Reimbursement FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker Deferred Compensation RIA Prison Disclosure NASAA Aguilar FCPA Subway Testimony Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank Hospital Due Process God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud FINOP CCO Compliance Audit Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Reuters Retaliation Variable Annuity Arbitraiton Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Series 7 Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA Disability MetLife Continuing Education Cheating OIP Tax Liens Willful CE Unregistered Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Impersonator Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks RMBS AML PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Password Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement Money Market employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Arrest Barclays Liens Failure To Supervise Apple Time And Price T&P Willfully Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Sexism Debit Card Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Charge Sexist NML Argentina Embezzlement Silver Investor Alert Evidence Judgment Bank Fraud Deceased Bill Singer BrokeAndBroker TSSB OHO Leveraged ETF Mary Jo White Trustee Motion To Dismiss Frumento Conspiracy 6th Circuit Proctor Commissioner Stein Rule 3040 Customer Files Class Action Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman 11th Circuit Insurance Gallagher White Self Regulation Short Sale Compromise Website Rule 2010 Check TRO Supervision Vacatur Remand SDNY Rule 12206 BrokeAndBroker Bill Singer Piwowar Stifel Rule 1122 Article V signature Confidential Inside Information Reg SP VA Regulation SP Fees Cease And Desist Customer Rule 3270 Rule 3240 Annual Compliance Questionnaire OWB 2Cir Red Flags Payroll Stockbrokers ALJ Cybercrime Loans BrokerCheck Altered Records
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+