An irreverent Wall Street Blog
by Bill Singer
Join BrokeAndBroker blog on Facebook  Follow the BrokeAndBroker blog on Twitter  Connect with BrokeAndBroker on LinkedIn  Join Bill Singer on Google+  Subscribe to RSS Feed

Ignorance Of The Law Defense Fails In Rule 10b-5 Case
Written: April 26, 2013

Bryan Behrens owned and operated 21st Century Financial Group, Inc., a life insurance agency and financial investment advising business; and he subsequently became the sole owner and operator of National Investments, Inc. (“NII”). After promoting NII as a safe and lucrative investment opportunity to his clients, Behrens issued promissory notes offering 7% to 9% fixed returns. Turns out that the investors’ money never quite made its way to its purported destination and Behrens used the funds to prop up his businesses and for his personal use – another Ponzi scheme, at its worst.

Following a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) investigation, in April 2009, a federal grand jury returned a 21-count indictment. Thereafter, Behrens entered into a plea agreement whose terms did not specifically address final sentencing. The pre-sentence investigation report calculated the advisory guidelines imprisonment range as 121-151 months. 

I Know Nuthin'

At his sentencing hearing, Behrens asserted the “No Knowledge” defense and argued he was ineligible for imprisonment because Section 78ff(a) imposes criminal liability for “[w]illful violations” of securities laws or SEC rules or regulations but allows defendants who prove they had “no knowledge” of the rule or regulation they violated to avoid imprisonment,

Round One

The District Court found that the “no knowledge” defense applies only to those convicted of violating SEC rules, rather than securities statutes, and because Behrens had pled guilty to violating the latter (§ 78j(b)), he accordingly could not take advantage of the “no knowledge” provision. The District Court sentenced Behrens to five years’ imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and $6,841,921.90 restitution.

On appeal, the 8th Circuit vacated the district court’s imposition of sixty months’ imprisonment, holding that individuals who are charged with violating both § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5 are still entitled to assert the no knowledge defense. United States v. Behrens, 644 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir. 2011). 

Round Two

On remand,  after finding that Behrens had failed to meet his burden of proving no knowledge and that he “was aware of the verbatim provisions of Rule 10b-5 and that they proscribed illegal conduct,” the District Court imposed the same sentence as in its first decision.

8th Circuit Appeal

Back on appeal to the 8th Circuit, Behrens argued that even if he was aware of the provisions of Rule 10b-5 as they relate to “securities,” his sales involved “promissory notes,” which he did not know constituted securities within the scope of Rule 10b-5. In response to that assertion, the Government urged that the proper statutory interpretation is that Behrens may only avoid prison if he proves by a preponderance of the evidence his ignorance of the existence of Rule 10b-5. USA v. Behrens (8th Circuit, April 25, 2013).


Initially, the 8th Circuit rejected the government’s proposed finding because the Court found that:
“no knowledge” cannot be limited as the Government urges, to no knowledge of the existence of the pertinent SEC rule or regulation.”

Ultimately, the 8fth Circuit determined that:

[T]he better reading of the no-knowledge provision is to allow individuals to avoid a sentence of imprisonment if they can establish that they did not know the substance of the SEC rule or regulation they allegedly violated, regardless of whether they understood its particular application to their conduct. . .

This rule protects from imprisonment individuals who truly are unaware of the substance of an SEC rule or regulation, but it does not go so far as to completely vitiate the principle that ignorance of the law is no defense . . .

Having reduced the task before it to a determination of whether Behrens carried the burden of proof as to his lack of knowledge of “the substance of Rule 10b-5,” the 8th Circuit noted this exchange at the sentencing hearing between the questioning government and the answering Behrens:

Q [Government]. Right. In any event, based on your experience,
you knew that it was illegal to fraudulently take money from investors
in connection with the purchase or sale of a security, didn’t you?
A [Behrens]. Yes.
Q. You knew that it was illegal to make a misrepresentation of a
material fact or an omission of a material fact related to the sale or
purchase of a security, didn’t you?
A. As it relates to a security, yes
Q. You know that it was illegal to engage in a course of conduct
which operates as a fraud or deceit upon a person relating to the
purchase or sale of a security, didn’t you?
A. As it relates to securities, yes.
Q. And you know that—do you know what I’ve just read to you
is Rule 10b-5?
A. As it relates to securities.

The 8th Circuit seems to have found that Behrens’ responses compelled a conclusion that he had sufficient knowledge of the substance of Rule 10b-5 and, as such, the District Court’s sentence of imprisonment was sustained.

SEC v. Behrens et al. (DNE, 8:08-CV-13, January 8, 2010)

SEC v. Behrens (SEC, OIP/Settlement, August 14, 2008)


Previous Entries
April 15, 2014
Stockbroker, Compliance, Legal, and Regulatory JobsFor a full listing of current job openings, visit the BrokeAndBroker Employment Page ... Read On
April 14, 2014
Auction Rate Securities are the unwanted gift that keeps on giving. In today's Blog, we report about yet another bit of collateral ... Read On
April 12, 2014
Citicorp Loses Bizarre Motion To Compel Class Action ArbitrationApril 11, 2014As part of the terms of his employment, former Citicorp Credit Services,... Read On
April 11, 2014
As part of the terms of his employment, former Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. employee Keith Russell had agreed to arbitrate “all employment-related d... Read On
April 10, 2014
Citigroup goes after another former employer to recover a balance on a promissory note. Nothing new here. In this case, the former registered person f... Read On
April 9, 2014
Alas, all good things come to an end and, sadly, E*TRADE (or is that E*Trade or is that Etrade or how the hell are you supposed to write that anyway?)... Read On Job Search
Related Topics
Tag Cloud
Internet FINRA Bear Stearns Bloomberg SEC NASD NYSE Money Laundering Due Diligence Waiver Forbes China Chepucavage Broy Woody Allen Madoff NAC NPR Marketplace Stanford UBS Ketchum Antitrust NASDAQ RRBDLAW Schapiro Bill Singer BrokerAndBroker USERRA Morgan Keegan Arbitration Khuzami BrokeAndBroker Aleynikov Goldman Sachs brokeandbroker Promissory Note U4 Bill SInger EFL CFTC Huffington Post Flash Crash arbitration RBC Ponzi Affinity Fraud Wachovia Raymond James Expungement Fraud Securities Fraud Outside Business Activity Registered Rep Magazine FOREX FBI Banc of America Pro Se Supreme Court Morgan Stanley Smith Barney E*Trade Margin email Galleon Penson U5 Defamation Protocol Wells Fargo Punitive Damages Citigroup Merrill Lynch ARS Employee Forgivable Loan Street Legal Morgan Stanley AWC Fidelity Bankruptcy Broke And Broker HFT David Sobel Day Trading Ameriprise Commissions Spouse Schwab CRD Kenneth Starr IRS CNBC Complaint ATM Skimming Hacking Phishing Malware Naskovets Poteroba Koval Lincoln Financial Selling Away Outside Business Activities Rakoff 2nd Circuit Second Circuit IRA 401k Forgery Tax Email Netschi Moore Whistleblower Street Sweeper Tran Bharara Facebook Online Severance Bonus Eligibility Rule TD Ameritrade Hedge Fund SAC 1099 Smith Barney Lehman Brothers IC3 Scottrade Lehman JPMorgan Chase Hertz Insider Trading Bank of America Elles Bribe Auction Rate Securities Raiding Spam Edward Jones Medicare Diabetes Dow Schumer Walter Bid Rigging Real Estate Discrimination Wall Street Statutory Disqualification Form U4 Form U5 Indictment Boyland DOJ Corruption bill singer FTC Do Not Call FINRA Arbitration Costa Rica Settlement LIBOR Varney Plea Rule 8210 RRBDlaw Appeal Fowler LPL Johnson US Airways Reg D MSSB Vault Loan SunTrust Discovery Employment Rosenthal Recruiting Lawyer Trading Platform JP Morgan Employment Tuesday Wrongful Termination Bank Guarantee WaMu Solicitation REIT Martin Credit Cards Away Account Credit Repair PN Advisor Placement Group Forex Mortgage Private Placement Moon Merrill Anderson Exam Lee Borrowing Tax Lien Conversion Oppenheimer Wedbush Felony Misdemeanor Expenses ING Lien OTR Estate Jobs Florida Credit Card Elderly Flash Drive Annuity FNMA BrokeAndBroke TIC DWI Promissory Notes Suitability Will POA Power of Attorney Casino NSF MF Global Counterfeit Preet Bharara Corzine Hacker Prison NASAA Aguilar FCPA Identity Theft Gold Dell Bar Injunction Bank Deutsche Bank God HSBC Private Placements Eric Stein Wire Fraud CCO Joshua Brown Backstage Wall Street Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Variable Annuity Outside Account Options Telephone Wine Social Media ADA Pacifico Non-Prosecution Agreement Confirm Tax Fraud Retirement OBA Equity Indexed Annuities EIA MetLife Continuing Education Impersonation Annuities BBVA Business Expenses OIP ETF JOBS Act Mail Fraud Parking Variable Annuities Signatures BitTorrent Wire Transfer Wire Crowdfunding Nasdaq Away Accounts WSP Laptop Dodd Frank Checks PST Solicited Unsolicited Congress SRO Wife Discretion Non-Solicitation Restaurant Commodities Private Securities Transaction Offer of Settlement employment jobs Great Recession Chase Investment Services Barclays Willful Apple Time And Price T&P Husband Letter of Authorization LOA Knight Test Practice Sale Unfair Competition Signature Judgments Undisclosed Settlement Trainee Fee Trust Laser Side Bar Mattera Female Sales Assistant Kennedy Argentina Judgment Bank Fraud TSSB Trustee Frumento 6th Circuit Proctor Beneficiary NYAG Schneiderman Gallagher White Compromise Website Supervision Piwowar signature VA
Email Bill Singer Connect with Bill Singer on Facebook Follow Bill Singer on Twitter Link up with Bill Singer on LinkedIn Join Bill Singer on Google+