February 25, 2013
FULL TEXT FINRA Decision On
Charles Schwab Arbitration Agreement
With Analysis By Bill Singer
Around October 1, 2011, Charles Schwab & Co. amended its Customer Account Agreement to include this waiver:
Waiver of Class Action or Representative Action
Neither you nor Schwab shall be entitled to arbitrate any claims as a class action or representative action, and the arbitrator(s) shall have no authority to consolidate more than one parties' [sic] claims or to proceed on a representative or class action basis.
You and Schwab agree that any actions between us and/or Related Third Parites shall be brought solely in our individual capacities. You and Schwab hereby waive any right to bring a class action or any type of representative action against each other or any Related Third Parties in court. You and Schwab waive any right to participate as a class member, or in any other capacity, in any class action or representative action brought by any other person, entity or agency against Schwab or you.
The FINRA Department of Enforcement filed a Complaint charging Respondent Schwab with violating FINRA rules concerning language or conditions that firms may place in customer agreements. FINRA alleged three causes of action (the first two largely dealing with the class action language and the third with arbitrators' ability to consolidate claims).
Read veteran Wall Street regulatory attorney Bill Singer's extensive analysis.
On February 22, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its much anticipated Opinion In re: Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC / James L Kruse, et al., Debtors/Claimants/Appellants v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Irving H. Picard, Appellees; and Securities And Exchange [...]
For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), without admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any issue, Juan Santana submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC"), which FINRA accepted. In the [...]
On June 23, 2012, Elvir Ardolic, 35, of New York, NY, boarded a JetBlue flight from New York City's John F. Kennedy International Airport bound for Chicago, IL. The only problem was that upon entering the aircraft, Ardolic was intoxicated. To make matters worse, during the flight, he became disruptive when the flight crew refused to serve him [...]
For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), without admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any issue, Donald Wayne Hastings submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC"), which [...]
In Florida v. Clayton Harris (U.S. Supreme Court, 568 U.S. __,February 19, 2013), K-9 Police Officer William Wheetley of the Liberty County Florida Sheriff's Office pulled over Clayton Harris on June 24, 2006, as part of a routine traffic stop - an expired license plate on his truck - and the officer found the driver to be [...]
For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), without admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any issue, Directed Services, LLC, ING; America Equities, Inc.; ING Financial Advisers, LLC; ING [...]
Sometime around April 2008, Christopher Brown Cornett, 43, of Buda, TX, came up with a business plan, an idea, a vision - well, okay, sure, federal prosecutors would more likely prefer to describe it as a crime. In hindsight, it wasn't all the clever a scam. If I were to merely describe Cornett's scheme as one involving a [...]