The Ol' Variable Annuity Switcheroo

September 3, 2015

Few products cause more regulatory pain for registered persons than Variable Annuities ("VAs"). No one really seems to like the stuff except for the fact that, well, you know, it's sort of lucrative and most brokerage firms push the salesforce to sell a ton of it.  Among the biggest pains with VAs is when customers are sitting with an older model and there's a financial incentive to registered reps to switch the customers into something newer. Ah, and then all regulatory hell is unleashed. Read this recent FINRA settlement.

Case In Point

For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), without admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any issue, Michael Jump submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC"), which FINRA accepted. In the Matter of Michael Jump, Respondent (AWC  2014039222501, August 25, 2015).

In 1983, Jump entered the securities industry and by 2008 he was registered with FINRA member firm Investment Planners, Inc. The AWC asserts that he had no prior disciplinary history.

Hitting the Switch

The AWC alleges that between April 2013 and April 2014, Jump prepared Variable Annuity Transmittal and Disclosure forms ("VA Switch Forms") for 32 VA transactions but he had provided incorrect information indicating that fees associated with older VAs were higher than the replacement annuities. FINRA deemed such conduct as a "negligent misrepresentation" in violation of FINRA Rule 2010.

Bill Singer's Comment: Apparently, FINRA did not find Jump's conduct here to be intentional but, as charged in the AWC, negligent misrepresentation. I think that the AWC should have added at least a sentence to clarify that distinction and explain why the self-regulator concluded that the subject conduct was merely negligent rather than intentional.  One explanation is that FINRA determined that Jump truly believed that the higher values were correct or that he relied upon what he did not know was outdated pricing. Another explanation is that Jump simply transposed numbers or inadvertently entered wrong data. Whatever the explanation, I don't quite understand how a Respondent "negligently" enters incorrect fee data.

A Matter of Suitability

Further, during June 2013 and February 2014, the AWC alleges that Jump made unsuitable recommendations in connection with five VA exchanges. Pointedly, Jump allegedly recommended that his customers liquidate VAs and use the proceeds to purchase new ones. The purchase prices for the five cited VAs ran from $20,000 to $70,00 and Jump's total commissions added up to about $6,900.

Coulda Shoulda

In early 2014, two of Jump's customers wanted to prevent the original VA provider from exercising its discretion to move funds from their variable accounts into fixed ones. As explained in the AWC, these two customers were concerned that any potential profits from a possible stock market rebound would be eliminated if their funds were moved into a fixed account.  The AWC asserts that Jumps recommendation to switch into new VAs was unsuitable because:

[J]ump could have met the customers' objective simply by cancelling the income riders on the original VAs. Instead Jump switched [the two customers] into new VAs, causing [the customers] to incur surrender charges of $811 and $2,564, respectively.

The AWC further asserts that three other customers desired to eliminate the income rider from their VAs in order to eliminate the rider's costs. In response to that goal, the AWC asserted that Jump's recommendation to liquidate and switch was unsuitable, and that the preferred alternative was an election to cancel the income rider. As set forth in the AWC, these three customers purchased policies in the amount of $45,000; $37,000, and $50,000 with respective surrender charges of $0, $1,324, and $1,686.

The Regulatory Bill

The AWC asserted that Jump's conduct constituted violations of FINRA Rules 2010, 2111 and 2330(b)(1). In accordance with the terms of the AWC, FINRA imposed upon Jump a $10,000 fine, a $6,889 plus interest disgorgement, and a two-month suspension.

Bill Singer's Comment

For those of you contemplating VA purchases or switches, consider the language of the Rule:

FINRA Rule 2330. Members' Responsibilities Regarding Deferred Variable Annuities

(a) General Considerations

(1) Application

This Rule applies to recommended purchases and exchanges of deferred variable annuities and recommended initial subaccount allocations. This Rule does not apply to reallocations among subaccounts made or to funds paid after the initial purchase or exchange of a deferred variable annuity. This Rule also does not apply to deferred variable annuity transactions made in connection with any tax-qualified, employer-sponsored retirement or benefit plan that either is defined as a "qualified plan" under Section 3(a)(12)(C) of the Exchange Act or meets the requirements of Internal Revenue Code Sections 403(b), 457(b), or 457(f), unless, in the case of any such plan, a member or person associated with a member makes recommendations to an individual plan participant regarding a deferred variable annuity, in which case the Rule would apply as to the individual plan participant to whom the member or person associated with the member makes such recommendations.

(2) Creation, Storage, and Transmission of Documents

For purposes of this Rule, documents may be created, stored, and transmitted in electronic or paper form, and signatures may be evidenced in electronic or other written form.

(3) Definitions

For purposes of this Rule, the term "registered principal" shall mean a person registered as a General Securities Sales Supervisor (Series 9/10), a General Securities Principal (Series 24) or an Investment Company Products/Variable Contracts Principal (Series 26), as applicable.

(b) Recommendation Requirements

(1) No member or person associated with a member shall recommend to any customer the purchase or exchange of a deferred variable annuity unless such member or person associated with a member has a reasonable basis to believe

(A) that the transaction is suitable in accordance with Rule 2111 and, in particular, that there is a reasonable basis to believe that

(i) the customer has been informed, in general terms, of various features of deferred variable annuities, such as the potential surrender period and surrender charge; potential tax penalty if customers sell or redeem deferred variable annuities before reaching the age of 59˝; mortality and expense fees; investment advisory fees; potential charges for and features of riders; the insurance and investment components of deferred variable annuities; and market risk;

(ii) the customer would benefit from certain features of deferred variable annuities, such as tax-deferred growth, annuitization, or a death or living benefit; and

(iii) the particular deferred variable annuity as a whole, the underlying subaccounts to which funds are allocated at the time of the purchase or exchange of the deferred variable annuity, and riders and similar product enhancements, if any, are suitable (and, in the case of an exchange, the transaction as a whole also is suitable) for the particular customer based on the information required by paragraph (b)(2) of this Rule; and

(B) in the case of an exchange of a deferred variable annuity, the exchange also is consistent with the suitability determination required by paragraph (b)(1)(A) of this Rule, taking into consideration whether

(i) the customer would incur a surrender charge, be subject to the commencement of a new surrender period, lose existing benefits (such as death, living, or other contractual benefits), or be subject to increased fees or charges (such as mortality and expense fees, investment advisory fees, or charges for riders and similar product enhancements);

(ii) the customer would benefit from product enhancements and improvements; and

(iii) the customer has had another deferred variable annuity exchange within the preceding 36 months.

The determinations required by this paragraph shall be documented and signed by the associated person recommending the transaction.

(2) Prior to recommending the purchase or exchange of a deferred variable annuity, a member or person associated with a member shall make reasonable efforts to obtain, at a minimum, information concerning the customer's age, annual income, financial situation and needs, investment experience, investment objectives, intended use of the deferred variable annuity, investment time horizon, existing assets (including investment and life insurance holdings), liquidity needs, liquid net worth, risk tolerance, tax status, and such other information used or considered to be reasonable by the member or person associated with the member in making recommendations to customers.

(3) Promptly after receiving information necessary to prepare a complete and correct application package for a deferred variable annuity, a person associated with a member who recommends the deferred variable annuity shall transmit the complete and correct application package to an office of supervisory jurisdiction of the member.

(c) Principal Review and Approval

Prior to transmitting a customer's application for a deferred variable annuity to the issuing insurance company for processing, but no later than seven business days after an office of supervisory jurisdiction of the member receives a complete and correct application package, a registered principal shall review and determine whether he or she approves of the recommended purchase or exchange of the deferred variable annuity.

A registered principal shall approve the recommended transaction only if he or she has determined that there is a reasonable basis to believe that the transaction would be suitable based on the factors delineated in paragraph (b) of this Rule.

The determinations required by this paragraph shall be documented and signed by the registered principal who reviewed and then approved or rejected the transaction.

(d) Supervisory Procedures

In addition to the general supervisory and recordkeeping requirements of Rules 3110, 3120, 3130, 3150, and 4510 Series, a member must establish and maintain specific written supervisory procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the standards set forth in this Rule. The member also must (1) implement surveillance procedures to determine if any of the member's associated persons have rates of effecting deferred variable annuity exchanges that raise for review whether such rates of exchanges evidence conduct inconsistent with the applicable provisions of this Rule, other applicable FINRA rules, or the federal securities laws ("inappropriate exchanges") and (2) have policies and procedures reasonably designed to implement corrective measures to address inappropriate exchanges and the conduct of associated persons who engage in inappropriate exchanges.

(e) Training

Members shall develop and document specific training policies or programs reasonably designed to ensure that associated persons who effect and registered principals who review transactions in deferred variable annuities comply with the requirements of this Rule and that they understand the material features of deferred variable annuities, including those described in paragraph (b)(1)(A)(i) of this Rule.

* * *Supplementary Material * * *

.01 Depositing of Funds by Members Prior to Principal Approval. Under Rule 2330, a member that is permitted to maintain customer funds under SEA Rules 15c3-1 and 15c3-3 may, prior to the member's principal approval of the deferred variable annuity, deposit and maintain customer funds for a deferred variable annuity in an account that meets the requirements of SEA Rule 15c3-3.

.02 Treatment of Lump-Sum Payment for Purchases of Different Products. If a customer provides a member that is permitted to hold customer funds with a lump sum or single check made payable to the member (as opposed to being made payable to the insurance company) and requests that a portion of the funds be applied to the purchase of a deferred variable annuity and the rest of the funds be applied to other types of products, Rule 2330 would not prohibit the member from promptly applying those portions designated for purchasing products other than a deferred variable annuity to such use. A member that is not permitted to hold customer funds can comply with such requests only through its clearing firm that will maintain customer funds for the intended deferred variable annuity purchase in an account that meets the requirements of SEA Rule 15c3-3. In such circumstances, the checks would need to be made payable to the clearing firm.

.03 Forwarding of Checks/Funds to Insurer Prior to Principal Approval. Rule 2330 does not prohibit a member from forwarding a check made payable to the insurance company or, if the member is fully subject to SEA Rule 15c3-3, transferring funds for the purchase of a deferred variable annuity to the insurance company prior to the member's principal approval of the deferred variable annuity, as long as the member fulfills the following requirements: (a) the member must disclose to the customer the proposed transfer or series of transfers of the funds and (b) the member must enter into a written agreement with the insurance company under which the insurance company agrees that, until such time as it is notified of the member's principal approval and is provided with the application or is notified of the member's principal rejection, it will (1) segregate the member's customers' funds in a bank in an account equivalent to the deposit of those funds by a member into a "Special Account for the Exclusive Benefit of Customers" (set up as described in SEA Rules 15c3-3(k)(2)(i) and 15c3-3(f)) to ensure that the customers' funds will not be subject to any right, charge, security interest, lien, or claim of any kind in favor of the member, insurance company, or bank where the insurance company deposits such funds or any creditor thereof or person claiming through them and hold those funds either as cash or any instrument that a broker or dealer may deposit in its Special Reserve Account for the Exclusive Benefit of Customers, (2) not issue the variable annuity contract prior to the member's principal approval, and (3) promptly return the funds to each customer at the customer's request prior to the member's principal approval or upon the member's rejection of the application.

.04 Forwarding of Checks/Funds to IRA Custodian Prior to Principal Approval. A member is not prohibited from forwarding a check provided by the customer for the purpose of purchasing a deferred variable annuity and made payable to an IRA custodian for the benefit of the customer (or, if the member is fully subject to SEA Rule 15c3-3, funds) to the IRA custodian prior to the member's principal approval of the deferred variable annuity transaction, as long as the member enters into a written agreement with the IRA custodian under which the IRA custodian agrees (a) to forward the funds to the insurance company to complete the purchase of the deferred variable annuity contract only after it has been informed that the member's principal has approved the transaction and (b), if the principal rejects the transaction, to inform the customer, seek immediate instructions from the customer regarding alternative disposition of the funds (e.g., asking whether the customer wants to transfer the funds to another IRA custodian, purchase a different investment, or provide other instructions), and promptly implement the customer's instructions.

.05 Gathering of Information Regarding Customer Exchanges. Rule 2330 requires that the member or person associated with a member consider whether the customer has had another deferred variable annuity exchange within the preceding 36 months. Under this provision, a member or person associated with a member must determine whether the customer has had such an exchange at the member and must make reasonable efforts to ascertain whether the customer has had an exchange at any other broker-dealer within the preceding 36 months. An inquiry to the customer as to whether the customer has had an exchange at another broker-dealer within 36 months would constitute a "reasonable effort" in this context. Members shall document in writing both the nature of the inquiry and the response from the customer.

.06 Sharing of Office Space and/or Employees. Rule 2330 requires principal review and approval "[p]rior to transmitting a customer's application for a deferred variable annuity to the issuing insurance company for processing…." In circumstances where an insurance company and its affiliated broker-dealer share office space and/or employees who carry out both the principal review and the issuance process, FINRA will consider the application "transmitted" to the insurance company only when the broker-dealer's principal, acting as such, has approved the transaction, provided that the affiliated broker-dealer and the insurance company have agreed that the insurance company will not issue the contract prior to principal approval by the broker-dealer.

.07 Sharing of Information. Rule 2330 does not prohibit using the information required for principal review and approval in the issuance process, provided that the broker-dealer and the insurance company have agreed that the insurance company will not issue the contract prior to principal approval by the broker-dealer. For instance, the rule does not prohibit a broker-dealer from inputting information used as part of its suitability review into a shared database (irrespective of the media used for that database, i.e., paper or electronic) that the insurance company uses for the issuance process, provided that the broker-dealer and the insurance company have agreed that the insurance company will not issue the contract prior to principal approval by the broker-dealer.