FINRA Suspends Stockbroker For Reimbursing Customer Options Losses

June 11, 2018

Wall Street can be a frustrating, infuriating, puzzling, and perplexing place to work. And those emotions can be felt with equal fervor by the industry's firms, employees, public customers, and regulators. At times, it seems that you get rewarded for doing bad and punished for doing good. Other times, what, at first blush, seemed good turns out to be bad and vice versa. There are no easy answers. There are no easy solutions. In today's BrokeAndBroker.com Blog we consider the story of a stockbroker who made a nice chunk of change for his customer in the speculative world of options trading -- that is, until the stockbroker made a few lousy investments and lost a nice chunk of change for the same customer. The options trading losses shocked the stockbroker, who came up with a formula to repay his client. It's nice that a stockbroker puts his money where his mouth is and digs into his own pocket when a proposed investment goes into the toilet. I'm sure the client thought he was dealing with a stand-up guy. The thing is, however, that the stockbroker entered into the repayment schedule without telling his employer brokerage firm. They got a rule against that on Wall Street. When you understand the rationale for the rule, it makes sense. Making sense is a good thing. How we make sure that sensible things get done isn't always a pretty sight to behold, as today's FINRA regulatory settlement demonstrates.

Case In Point

For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), without admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any issue, Michael P. Spolar submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC"), which FINRA accepted. In the Matter of Michael P. Spolar, Respondent (AWC 2017055773501, June 7, 2018).

Spolar was first registered in 1991, and by April 2015, he was registered with International Assets Advisory, LLC. ("IAA").

Prior History

Under the heading "Relevant Disciplinary History," the AWC asserts:

On May 16, 2017, FINRA accepted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which Spolar consented to the entry of findings by FINRA that, between February 28, 2013, and April 13, 2015, he improperly exercised discretionary trading authority in customer accounts in violation of NASD Rule 2510(b) and FINRA Rule 2010, and to the imposition of sanctions consisting of a one-month suspension from association with any FINRA member fum in any capacity. A monetary sanction was not imposed due to a bankruptcy. FINRA AWC No. 2016050379401.

SIDE BAR: Read the FULL TEXT 2017 Spolar AWC http://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/2016050379401_FDA_SL678111.pdf

Customer FJ

The 2018 Spolar AWC asserts that in 1997, a customer identified as "FJ" opened an account with Spolar. The AWC alleges that at the time, FJ had primarily invested in high-yield bond mutual funds and options contracts. Following recommendations by Spolar, in April 2015, FJ increased his options investing. 

Options Trading

The AWC characterizes the first six months of the options trading in FJ's account as "heavy options trading." That six-month period resulted in an increase in FJ's account's value from $200,000 to $254,000. Thereafter, the AWC notes that one option purchase in October 2015 and another in March 2016 resulted in about $188,000 in losses.

Dismay

At a meeting in June 2016, the AWC asserts that Spolar allegedly expressed his dismay with the losses that FJ had incurred. In an effort to recoup FJ's options losses, Spolar calculated what the lost principal would have earned on a monthly basis in a high-yield bond fund. Spolar then offered to make monthly payments that monthly yield until all of FJ's losses were covered. Between July 30, 2016 and July 14, 2017, Spolar, without seeking or obtaining approval from IAA, issued nine personal  totaling approximately $2,100 (apparently the calculated high-yield bond fund monthly yield). 

SIDE BAR: FINRA Rule 2150: Improper Use of Customers' Securities or Funds; Prohibition Against Guarantees and Sharing in Accounts

(a) Improper Use

No member or person associated with a member shall make improper use of a customer's securities or funds.

(b) Prohibition Against Guarantees

No member or person associated with a member shall guarantee a customer against loss in connection with any securities transaction or in any securities account of such customer.

(c) Sharing in Accounts; Extent Permissible

(1)(A) Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2), no member or person associated with a member shall share directly or indirectly in the profits or losses in any account of a customer carried by the member or any other member; provided, however, that a member or person associated with a member may share in the profits or losses in such an account if:

(i) such person associated with a member obtains prior written authorization from the member employing the associated person;

(ii) such member or person associated with a member obtains prior written authorization from the customer; and

(iii) such member or person associated with a member shares in the profits or losses in any account of such customer only in direct proportion to the financial contributions made to such account by either the member or person associated with a member.

(B) Exempt from the direct proportionate share limitation of paragraph (c)(1)(A)(iii) are accounts of the immediate family of such member or person associated with a member. For purposes of this Rule, the term "immediate family" shall include parents, mother-in-law or father-in-law, husband or wife, children or any relative to whose support the member or person associated with a member otherwise contributes directly or indirectly.

(2) Notwithstanding the prohibition of paragraph (c)(1), a member or person associated with a member that is acting as an investment adviser may receive compensation based on a share in profits or gains in an account if:

(A) such person associated with a member seeking such compensation obtains prior written authorization from the member employing the associated person;

(B) such member or person associated with a member seeking such compensation obtains prior written authorization from the customer; and

(C) all of the conditions in Rule 205-3 of the Investment Advisers Act (as the same may be amended from time to time) are satisfied.

*** Supplementary Material ***

.01 Inapplicability of Rule to Certain Guarantees. For purposes of paragraph (b) of this Rule, a "guarantee" that is extended to all holders of a particular security by an issuer as part of that security generally would not be subject to the prohibition against guarantees.

.02 Permissible Reimbursement by Member of Certain Losses. Nothing in this Rule shall preclude a member, but not an associated person of the member, from determining on an after-the-fact basis, to reimburse a customer for transaction losses; provided, however, that the member shall comply with all reporting requirements that may be applicable to such payment. For example, if the payment can reasonably be construed as a settlement, the member shall report the payment as a settlement under the applicable reporting requirement(s). In addition, nothing in this Rule shall preclude a member, but not an associated person of the member, from correcting a bona fide error. This Supplementary Material .02 does not apply to an associated person of a member because of the concern that any such payment may conceal individual misconduct.

.03 Record Retention. For purposes of paragraph (c) of this Rule, members shall preserve the required written authorization(s) for at least six years after the date the account is closed.

.04 Applicability of Other Rules to Sharing Arrangements. Members and associated persons should be aware that participation in a sharing arrangement permitted under paragraph (c) of this Rule does not affect the applicability of other FINRA rules, including paragraph (b) of this Rule, FINRA Rules 3210, 3270 and 3280 to such sharing arrangement.

Discharge

The AWC asserts that ln November 9, 2017, IAA filed a Uniform Termination Notice for Securities Industry Registration  (Form U5) terminating Spolar's registration. 

FINRA Sanctions

FINRA deemed Spolar's cited conduct to constitute violations of FINRA Rules 2150(c) and 2010. In accordance with the terms of the AWC, FINRA imposed a one-month suspension from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. The AWC notes that:

Respondent has submitted a sworn financial statement and demonstrated an inability to pay a monetary sanction. In light of the financial status of Respondent, a monetary sanction is not imposed. 

Bill Singer's Comment

Online FINRA BrokerCheck records as of June 8, 2018, disclose that Spolar filed for a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy on December 23, 2015. 

Under the heading of "Employment Separation After Allegations" BrokerCheck discloses two matters:

International Assets Advisory, LLC "Discharged" Spolar on October 9, 2017 based upon allegations that he had "contacted clients during suspension."

LPL Financial LLC "Discharged" Spolar on April 13, 2015, based upon allegations that of "discretionary trading in brokerage accounts in violation of firm policy."

Under the heading "Customer Dispute - Pending" BrokerCheck discloses that LPL Financial LLC had received a FINRA Arbitration complaint on March 16, 2018, and LPL Financial LLC and International Assets Advisory had received a FINRA Arbitration complaint on December 28, 2017, alleging "unsuitable recommendations and margin trading at LPL." Damages sought were not specified.

Under the heading "Customer Dispute - Settled" are eight disclosures dating from 2017 back to 2004. The settlements were for $57,000; $101,500; $40,000; $30,000; $140,000; $450,000; $2,550,000 (an Auction Rate Securities dispute); and $70,000. In total, Spolar contributed $12,500.